1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00338309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous rupture of a pancreatic pseudocyst into the portal vein

Abstract: Spontaneous rupture of a pancreatic pseudocyst into the portal vein is described. This has been previously reported in only five cases. Diagnosis was made by computed tomography (CT) and was confirmed by CT-guided transhepatic portography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, intrahepatic pseudocysts are rare, with few reports in the literature of rupture into the portal vein [1][2][3][4]. The pathogenesis of intrahepatic formation of the pseudocyst appears controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, intrahepatic pseudocysts are rare, with few reports in the literature of rupture into the portal vein [1][2][3][4]. The pathogenesis of intrahepatic formation of the pseudocyst appears controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Spontaneous rupture of a pancreatic pseudocyst occurs in less than 3% of affected patients and presents either as an acute abdominal event, or as pancreatic ascites or pleural effusion (7). However, rupture of a pseudocyst into the portal circulation is distinctly unusual, with only 23 cases published since its first description in 1966 (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). In 17 cases, there was underlying chronic alcoholic pancreatitis, and in one patient, a pancreatic adenocarcinoma was identified at autopsy in addition to chronic pancreatitis (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of this venous complication is distinctly unusual. In fact, only a few cases have been reported in the literature [96,97]. Diagnostic confirmation of the fistula cannot be achieved by angiography because the portal tree is excluded from the systemic circulation because of its cystic transformation.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Management Of Venous Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 97%