2016
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4066-15.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Release Regulates Synaptic Scaling in the Embryonic Spinal Network In Vivo

Abstract: Homeostatic plasticity mechanisms maintain cellular or network spiking activity within a physiologically functional range through compensatory changes in synaptic strength or intrinsic cellular excitability. Synaptic scaling is one form of homeostatic plasticity that is triggered after blockade of spiking or neurotransmission in which the strengths of all synaptic inputs to a cell are multiplicatively scaled upward or downward in a compensatory fashion. We have shown previously that synaptic upscaling could be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that activity levels in our culture and slice models are altered transiently after initial loss of protein and normalize before the time of assessment, but another intriguing hypothesis is that the signalling cascades driven by spontaneous neurotransmission and normally associated with homeostasis are, in fact, separable from signalling cascades driven by activity. Supporting this view, a recent study showed that chick embryonic spinal cord neurons appear to produce scaling in response to changes in spontaneous neurotransmission after, and sometimes in the absence of, homeostatic changes in evoked neurotransmission 46 . Although vti1a- and VAMP-dependent neurotransmission triggers signalling cascades known to be involved in homeostatic processes 19 and, therefore, may physiologically participate in activity homeostasis, it is possible that these forms of neurotransmission operate with some degree of independence 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is possible that activity levels in our culture and slice models are altered transiently after initial loss of protein and normalize before the time of assessment, but another intriguing hypothesis is that the signalling cascades driven by spontaneous neurotransmission and normally associated with homeostasis are, in fact, separable from signalling cascades driven by activity. Supporting this view, a recent study showed that chick embryonic spinal cord neurons appear to produce scaling in response to changes in spontaneous neurotransmission after, and sometimes in the absence of, homeostatic changes in evoked neurotransmission 46 . Although vti1a- and VAMP-dependent neurotransmission triggers signalling cascades known to be involved in homeostatic processes 19 and, therefore, may physiologically participate in activity homeostasis, it is possible that these forms of neurotransmission operate with some degree of independence 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Following GABA A R blockade, compensatory changes in synaptic strength (scaling) were not observed until 48 h, but voltage-gated conductance changes were triggered by 12 h (Wilhelm and Wenner, 2008;Wilhelm et al, 2009). It has been recently reported that simply reducing GABA A R activation due to spontaneous miniature release of GABA vesicles (spontaneous GABAergic transmission) was sufficient to trigger upscaling (Garcia-Bereguiain et al, 2016). We were able to do this by taking advantage of our observation that manipulating nicotinic receptor activation altered spontaneous GABAergic release (Gonzalez-Islas et al, 2016).…”
Section: The Trigger For Changes In Rmp Was Distinct From the Homeostmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Assuming the increase in episode frequency as inhibitory synapses become even more inhibitory can be observed, what possible role could it have? Many of the developmental changes that occur during network maturation, including the change in reversal potential of GABAergic synapses (Ganguly et al, 2001 ; Garcia-Bereguiain et al, 2016 ) are dependent on spontaneous activity, which recruits large parts of the network in a coordinated manner. If spontaneous activity stopped too early, this could prevent some of the activity-dependent changes to occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%