2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts learning from negative, but not positive, outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
64
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
64
8
Order By: Relevance
“…in Kaminer, Powers, Horn, Hui, & Evinger, 2011; 15,2 p/min. in Slagter, Georgopoulou, & Frank, 2015). It has been demonstrated that sEBR is significantly affected by the time of day, and rises after 5pm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…in Kaminer, Powers, Horn, Hui, & Evinger, 2011; 15,2 p/min. in Slagter, Georgopoulou, & Frank, 2015). It has been demonstrated that sEBR is significantly affected by the time of day, and rises after 5pm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They also found that D 2 receptor density predicted learning from positive feedback during reversal learning. Behavioral evidence with humans supports the role of EBR as an indicator of D 2 receptor availability (Slagter, Georgopoulou, & Frank, 2015). However, in this study, which examined the effect of spontaneous EBR on a probabilistic reinforcement learning task, EBR predicted learning from negative outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although previous research proposed that eyeblink rate is an indicator of striatal dopamine levels (Karson, 1983; Taylor et al, 1999), extensive pharmacological and behavioral work in both monkeys and humans has implicated the role of EBR as an indicator of dopamine D 1 and D 2 receptor availability, specifically, in the striatum (Elsworth et al, 1999; Groman et al, 2014; Jutkiewicz & Bergman, 2004; Kaminer et al, 2011; Kleven & Koek, 1996; Slagter et al, 2015). While there is evidence for the contribution of both D 1 and D 2 receptors, a recent pharmacological PET study compared the effects of D 1 and D 2 receptor agonists on spontaneous EBR in male vervet monkeys (Groman et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to reflexive EB, spontaneous blinks do not require sensory inputs. It appears that their underlying mechanism is an internal blink generator (Kaminer et al 2011), dopamine-mediated to some extent (Colzato et al 2008;Ladas et al 2014;Slagter et al 2015). Indeed, the spontaneous EB rate in some dopamine-related psychiatric conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia) was found to vary when compared to that of the general population (Karson et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%