1959
DOI: 10.2502/janip1944.9.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous alternation of two closely-placed goals in the white rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1965
1965

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found with cochroaches (Iwahara, 1956;Iwahara & Soeda, 1957) and with isopods (Iwahara, 1963;Iwahara & Suzuki, 1964). However, the significant subject variance was observed in alternation when rats were used as Ss (Iwahara, 1957; same result was obtained with human Ss from the analysis of our previous studies in human alternation (Iwahara, 1959). Similarly individual differences were found to be significant in time measures in our alternation studies with rats (Fujita, 1955;Iwahara, Washiyama & Matsubara, 1959).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were found with cochroaches (Iwahara, 1956;Iwahara & Soeda, 1957) and with isopods (Iwahara, 1963;Iwahara & Suzuki, 1964). However, the significant subject variance was observed in alternation when rats were used as Ss (Iwahara, 1957; same result was obtained with human Ss from the analysis of our previous studies in human alternation (Iwahara, 1959). Similarly individual differences were found to be significant in time measures in our alternation studies with rats (Fujita, 1955;Iwahara, Washiyama & Matsubara, 1959).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, the significant subject variance was observed in alternation when rats were used as Ss (Iwahara, 1957; same result was obtained with human Ss from the analysis of our previous studies in human alternation (Iwahara, 1959). Similarly individual differences were found to be significant in time measures in our alternation studies with rats (Fujita, 1955;Iwahara, Washiyama & Matsubara, 1959). It is interesting to notice that the effect of intertrial interval upon alternation was not found and at the same time there were no significant individual variations in alternation in lower organisms, while both effects appeared in higher organisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%