2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous alternation behavior in Paramecium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely related to how spontaneous alternation has evolved into a standard test for memory in transgenic rodent models of human conditions (e.g., O'Leary, Hussin, Gunn, & Brown, ; Snider & Obrietan, ) or evaluating effects of pharmacological agents (Hughes, ). However, spontaneous alternation has been observed in several other nonhuman organisms, including larval zebrafish (Bögli & Huang, ) and black molly fish (Creson, Woodruff, Ferslew, Rasch, & Monaco, ), ants (Czaczkes, Koch, Fröber, & Dreisbach, ), fruit flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ; Lewis, Negelspach, Kaladchibachi, Cowen, & Fernandez, ), paramecium (Harvey & Bovell, ), marmosets (Izumi, Tsuchida, & Yamaguchi, ), and in some species of crab (but not others—Balcı, Ramey‐Balcı, & Ruamps, ; Ramey, Teichman, Oleksiak, & Balci, ). In other species, evidence for spontaneous alternation behavior is debatable (lemurs, Dal‐Pan et al, ; chicks, Hayes & Warren, ; hens, Haskell, Forkman & Waddington, ) or contrary (e.g., pigeons, Hughes, ).…”
Section: Exploring Similarities and Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely related to how spontaneous alternation has evolved into a standard test for memory in transgenic rodent models of human conditions (e.g., O'Leary, Hussin, Gunn, & Brown, ; Snider & Obrietan, ) or evaluating effects of pharmacological agents (Hughes, ). However, spontaneous alternation has been observed in several other nonhuman organisms, including larval zebrafish (Bögli & Huang, ) and black molly fish (Creson, Woodruff, Ferslew, Rasch, & Monaco, ), ants (Czaczkes, Koch, Fröber, & Dreisbach, ), fruit flies ( Drosophila melanogaster ; Lewis, Negelspach, Kaladchibachi, Cowen, & Fernandez, ), paramecium (Harvey & Bovell, ), marmosets (Izumi, Tsuchida, & Yamaguchi, ), and in some species of crab (but not others—Balcı, Ramey‐Balcı, & Ruamps, ; Ramey, Teichman, Oleksiak, & Balci, ). In other species, evidence for spontaneous alternation behavior is debatable (lemurs, Dal‐Pan et al, ; chicks, Hayes & Warren, ; hens, Haskell, Forkman & Waddington, ) or contrary (e.g., pigeons, Hughes, ).…”
Section: Exploring Similarities and Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors claimed that the results could be assumed as an example of Hull’s reactive inhibition (Hull, 1943). However, neither Lachman and Havlena (1962) nor Harvey and Bovell (2006) replicated Lepley and Rice’s experiment. Hanzel and Rucker (1972) and Huber et al (1974) showed data about escape from tubes by paramecia as proof of the use of trial-and-error strategies.…”
Section: Learning In Protista: Parameciummentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The structure of the apparatus was appropriate for examining turn-alternation behavior, as it is known to influence the emergence of this particular behavior [ 21 ]. However, our research did not focus on which parameters affected turn alternation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%