2019
DOI: 10.1111/eth.12957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous activity rates and resting metabolism: Support for the allocation model of energy management at the among‐individual level

Abstract: Despite continuing interest in the proximate energetic constraints on individual variation in behavior, there is presently equivocal evidence for correlations between metabolism and behavior at the among‐individual level. Possible reasons for this include imprecise estimates of individual mean behavior and metabolism due to no repeated measures on one or more of the traits, analyses that do not take into account the labile nature of these traits and the uncertainty in individual estimates, and changing environ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in a similar way to larger foragers, foragers with higher metabolic rates are expected to exploit the resource faster when it is abundant and to leave resource patches earlier and at higher resource densities than foragers of similar size but with lower metabolic rates. However, negative correlations between basal metabolic rate and activity levels have also been observed (Cano and Nicieza 2006, Biro et al 2019), supporting the alternative hypothesis that those individuals with higher resting metabolic rates allocate less energy to movement and other behavioural activities (Nilsson 2002, Careau et al 2008). These conflicting findings underline the need for a more comprehensive exploration of the variations in foraging behaviour linked to foragers’ individual energetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Hence, in a similar way to larger foragers, foragers with higher metabolic rates are expected to exploit the resource faster when it is abundant and to leave resource patches earlier and at higher resource densities than foragers of similar size but with lower metabolic rates. However, negative correlations between basal metabolic rate and activity levels have also been observed (Cano and Nicieza 2006, Biro et al 2019), supporting the alternative hypothesis that those individuals with higher resting metabolic rates allocate less energy to movement and other behavioural activities (Nilsson 2002, Careau et al 2008). These conflicting findings underline the need for a more comprehensive exploration of the variations in foraging behaviour linked to foragers’ individual energetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The allocation of metabolic resources is therefore fundamentally different between endotherms and ectotherms, which might affect the correlation between RMR and fitness. The extensive variation in RMRwhich is often repeatable within individuals (Nespolo and Franco 2007;Auer et al 2016;Biro et al 2020) and heritable across generations (White and Kearney 2013;Pettersen et al 2018)is hypothesized to have consequences for fitness due to correlations between fitness-related traits and RMR (Burton et al 2011). Two main mechanistic hypotheses for the correlation between RMR and fitness have been proposed and tested in a variety of systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, individuals could be able to sustain energetically demanding personalities (or the behaviors associated with these personalities) by spending less energy at rest. Such a trade-off has been observed between metabolic rate and boldness in fall field crickets ( Gryllus pennsylvanicus ) [ 30 ] and with activity in mosquito fish ( Gambusia holbrooki ) [ 31 ]. In humans, there have been suggestions that total daily energy expenditure is bounded to a fixed level such that an increase in daily energy expenditure (e.g., by engaging in physical activity) is associated with a corresponding decrease in basal energy expenditure [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%