2007
DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00040-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sponge-Associated Microorganisms: Evolution, Ecology, and Biotechnological Potential

Abstract: SUMMARY Marine sponges often contain diverse and abundant microbial communities, including bacteria, archaea, microalgae, and fungi. In some cases, these microbial associates comprise as much as 40% of the sponge volume and can contribute significantly to host metabolism (e.g., via photosynthesis or nitrogen fixation). We review in detail the diversity of microbes associated with sponges, including extensive 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic analyses which support the previously suggested existence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

42
1,512
2
36

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,276 publications
(1,655 citation statements)
references
References 470 publications
(764 reference statements)
42
1,512
2
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolism and stress response The characteristics described above facilitate the persistence of a distinct bacterial community in C. concentrica, allowing for the maintenance of specific sponge-bacteria functional relationships. Sponge-associated bacteria have long been speculated to have evolved metabolic dependencies on their host or specific metabolic properties suitable for their environment (reviewed in Taylor et al, 2007b). Four observations from our analyses support this:…”
Section: Mobile Genetic Elements and Genetic Transfersupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metabolism and stress response The characteristics described above facilitate the persistence of a distinct bacterial community in C. concentrica, allowing for the maintenance of specific sponge-bacteria functional relationships. Sponge-associated bacteria have long been speculated to have evolved metabolic dependencies on their host or specific metabolic properties suitable for their environment (reviewed in Taylor et al, 2007b). Four observations from our analyses support this:…”
Section: Mobile Genetic Elements and Genetic Transfersupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In contrast, the community of C. concentrica was dominated by distinct phylogenetic clusters within the g-proteobacteria, Phyllobacteriaceae, Sphingomondales, Neisseriales and Nitrospiracae, among others (Figure 1). In particular, the a-and g-proteobacterial groups are related to bacteria found in other sponges, as previously reported (Taylor et al, 2005(Taylor et al, , 2007b, whereas phyla such as Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi described to be present in some sponge species are absent in C. concentrica. A total of 34 sequences (0.95% of all sequences) were common to both the C. concentrica and the planktonic community.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, advances in molecular techniques, such as 16S rRNA gene-based clone library, fluorescence in situ hybridization, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), provide a culture-independent means to improve resolution on revealing the microbial diversity and to make a more accurate phylogenetic affiliation assessment for microbes in a complex community such as sponges. Using these techniques, 20 bacterial and 2 archaeal phyla were discovered in sponges from different geographic locations up to 2008 (Taylor et al, 2007;Webster et al, 2008;Zhu et al, 2008). In addition, sponges from geographically separated regions shared high similarity in their bacterial communities, and sequence clusters specific for sponges absent from the surrounding sea water were identified (Friedrich et al, 2001;Hentschel et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the assignment of reads to previously described sponge-specific clusters, 16S rRNA sequences were first extracted from an ARB database containing the sponge-specific cluster sequences (Taylor et al, 2007). V5 and V6 regions of the recruited cluster sequences were split by recognizing the U789F and U1068R primers, and then aligned with the tag pyrosequence reads using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%