2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting or Lumping? A Conservation Dilemma Exemplified by the Critically Endangered Dama Gazelle (Nanger dama)

Abstract: Managers of threatened species often face the dilemma of whether to keep populations separate to conserve local adaptations and minimize the risk of outbreeding, or whether to manage populations jointly to reduce loss of genetic diversity and minimise inbreeding. In this study we examine genetic relatedness and diversity in three of the five last remaining wild populations of dama gazelle and a number of captive populations, using mtDNA control region and cytochrome b data. Despite the sampled populations belo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of recent molecular research on dama gazelle ( Nanger dama ) present a contrasting scenario. Senn et al () used mitochondrial sequencing to investigate genetic differences between a variable number of subspecies described across a cline in dorsal coloration. Because dama gazelles are critically endangered (IUCN, ), and captive animals undoubtedly represent assurance populations for this species, accurate taxonomic classification is important for appropriately structuring cooperative breeding programs.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of recent molecular research on dama gazelle ( Nanger dama ) present a contrasting scenario. Senn et al () used mitochondrial sequencing to investigate genetic differences between a variable number of subspecies described across a cline in dorsal coloration. Because dama gazelles are critically endangered (IUCN, ), and captive animals undoubtedly represent assurance populations for this species, accurate taxonomic classification is important for appropriately structuring cooperative breeding programs.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because dama gazelles are critically endangered (IUCN, ), and captive animals undoubtedly represent assurance populations for this species, accurate taxonomic classification is important for appropriately structuring cooperative breeding programs. After finding no genetic support for three putative subspecies, Senn et al () concluded that captive populations should be managed as a single taxonomic unit, in spite of coloration differences, to maximally maintain genetic diversity.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mhorr gazelle is one of three subspecies of dama gazelles N. dama (Pallas, 1766; Senn et al, ), all deemed to be critically endangered (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 10 individuals, taken into captivity in the Experimental Station of Arid Zones of Almeria in Spain in 1971, have survived (Bel Haj Kacem et al, ). One male and three female were the founders of the world captive population (Senn et al, ). The actual number of captive Mhorr gazelles is 293 (119 males and 174 females) in addition to 309 (146 males and 163 females) captive red‐necked gazelle ( Nanger dama ruficollis ; RZSS 1 IUCN Antelope Specialist Group, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers need to consider the taxonomic relationship of a species when designing conservation and management programs. Excessive splitting of species based on the phylogenetic species concept has become common practice within mammal taxonomy and can have profound effects on conservation programs (Senn, Banfield, Wacher, Newby, & Rabeil, 2014; Zachos et al, 2013). Though we used a single mitochondrial locus, our data suggest that C. t. taurinus are different enough from the other subspecies of C. taurinus to easily distinguish subspecific lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%