2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split root fertigation enhances cucumber yield in both an open and a semi-closed greenhouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the use of split N application via drip irrigation increased maize grain yield by 15 and 15% under H and by 13 and 14% under L, compared with conventional fertilization in 2012 and 2013, respec-tively. This yield increase resulting from split application of N is consistent with the results of other studies (David et al, 2004;Hebbar et al, 2004;Jokinen et al, 2011). The increased grain yield for drip fertigation under L was mainly the result of greater kernel mass, whereas an increase in both kernels per ear and kernel mass probably contributed to the yield increase for drip fertigation under H. Grain yield and kernel mass varied significantly between years and was probably related to the lower soil water content at R3 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, the use of split N application via drip irrigation increased maize grain yield by 15 and 15% under H and by 13 and 14% under L, compared with conventional fertilization in 2012 and 2013, respec-tively. This yield increase resulting from split application of N is consistent with the results of other studies (David et al, 2004;Hebbar et al, 2004;Jokinen et al, 2011). The increased grain yield for drip fertigation under L was mainly the result of greater kernel mass, whereas an increase in both kernels per ear and kernel mass probably contributed to the yield increase for drip fertigation under H. Grain yield and kernel mass varied significantly between years and was probably related to the lower soil water content at R3 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, the water uptake per leaf area was lower in the high EC than that in the low EC treatment. High EC nutrient solution (more than 3.5 dS m −1 ) reduces the water potential in the root zone and reduces water uptake (Li and Stanghellini, 2001;Jokinen et al, 2011;van de Sanden and Veen, 1992). In our experiment, in the high EC treatment, low water potential in the root zone reduced water uptake in both G m and G c and caused the difference to be less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The increasing N fertilizer consumption leads to environmental problems such as greenhouse gas emission and N loss. Fertigation, which integrates irrigation and fertilization, has showed many advantages, including direct supplement to root-zone, a lasting, stable environment of water and fertilizer, less soil fixation to fertilizer and less greenhouse gas emission 10,11 . Some studies indicated that fertigation can contribute to higher yield, nutrient uptake 12,13 and nutrient utilization under rational fertilization level 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%