2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split form ALE discontinuous Galerkin methods with applications to under-resolved turbulent low-Mach number flows

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations are also true for the dynamics of the lower surface boundary layer; although the SA-BCM model predicts the presence of three clockwise-rotating structures, the use of a fully turbulent SA closure does not seem to be able to capture any vorticity ejection into the fluid domain. The higher accuracy resulting from the application of a transition model is made evident upon inspection of the three-dimensional results in [11,12]. The early transition state at the upper surface, with the presence of span-wise homogeneous vortices, seems to be exactly captured by the SA-BCM model.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar observations are also true for the dynamics of the lower surface boundary layer; although the SA-BCM model predicts the presence of three clockwise-rotating structures, the use of a fully turbulent SA closure does not seem to be able to capture any vorticity ejection into the fluid domain. The higher accuracy resulting from the application of a transition model is made evident upon inspection of the three-dimensional results in [11,12]. The early transition state at the upper surface, with the presence of span-wise homogeneous vortices, seems to be exactly captured by the SA-BCM model.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even though an accurate capture of the LEV dynamics, and thus an overall accurate flow description, is thought to be fundamental for precise computation of the forces exerted on the profile, the simulated configuration revealed to be solely dominated by the dynamics of the profile motion rather than the flow structure itself. Such an observation seems to be justified by the small difference in the forces predicted by the two models, even though SA-BCM allowed the derivation of a much more accurate representation of the relevant flow features with respect to the standard SA, especially when compared with the threedimensional results in [11,12]. To demonstrate this, in Table 1 the thrust coefficients derived from the two models are reported as averages realized over five motion periods together with the aforementioned experimental and numerical reference values.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations