2015
DOI: 10.13164/re.2015.0749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split Distributed Computing in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state consensus is achieved by the non-linear term, while the performance optimization is ensured by the linear term to some degree. The authors of paper [29] present an optimization mechanism based on a division of the computation process into two phases. The first one is the phase of reaching the local consensuses and the second one is the phase of reaching the global consensus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state consensus is achieved by the non-linear term, while the performance optimization is ensured by the linear term to some degree. The authors of paper [29] present an optimization mechanism based on a division of the computation process into two phases. The first one is the phase of reaching the local consensuses and the second one is the phase of reaching the global consensus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a distributed converging algorithm whose purpose is that each node in a WSN converges to the value counted as the average from all the initial values [11]. Thanks to its simplicity, it is widely implemented into WSNs [12].…”
Section: Average Consensus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its higher value ensures a higher computation rate, however, it might cause the divergence of the algorithm. The interval in which the algorithm converges is determined as follows [11], [13]:…”
Section: Average Consensus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations