Split D differential probe model validation using an impedance analyzer

Mooers, Ryan D.; Knopp, Jeremy S.; Aldrin, John C.; Sathish, Shamachary

doi:10.1063/1.4865002

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering the advantages associated with the surface differential probes, a growing number of researchers focused on the modelling of this type of configuration. Most of the current works are devoted to numerical modelling and parametric studies of split-D differential probes since the experimental tests may be time-consuming and costly [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, in the work developed by Mooers et al [15,16], the results obtained from two numerical software packages, namely VIC-3D and EC SIM, were compared with experimental measurements of a split-D probe.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the current works are devoted to numerical modelling and parametric studies of split-D differential probes since the experimental tests may be time-consuming and costly [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. For instance, in the work developed by Mooers et al [15,16], the results obtained from two numerical software packages, namely VIC-3D and EC SIM, were compared with experimental measurements of a split-D probe. VIC-3D and EC SIM were employed again to conduct a parametric sweep on the dimensions of each constituting component of a split-D probe, and the influence of each parameter on the recorded signals was studied as the probe scanned a notch [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Finite Element Modelling of a Reflection Differential Split-D Eddy Current Probe Scanning Surface Notches

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Differential eddy current probes are commonly used to detect shallow surface cracks in conductive materials. In recent years, a growing number of research works on their numerical modelling was conducted since the development of analytical or semi-analytical models for such a sensor may be prone to intractable complications. In this paper finite element modelling (FEM) has been employed to simulate the interaction of a reflection differential split-D probe with surface electrical discharge machined (EDM) notches in 3-dimensional (3-D) half-space. In order to attain a better insight into the correct setup of the FEM parameters, a simple multi-turn cylindrical absolute coil has also been modelled. The outcome generated through the simulated scan of this absolute coil over a surface notch in aluminum is validated with existing experimental impedance data taken from the literature. Parameters contributing to reliable FEM simulation results, such as maximum mesh size, mesh distribution, the extent of the surrounding air domain and conductivity of the air are investigated for the 3-D modelling of both absolute and differential probes. This study shows that the simulation results on a commercial reflection differential split-D surface pencil probe closely estimate the experimental measurements of the probe's impedance variations as it scans three EDM notches having different depths in aluminum. The simulation results, generated by Comsol Multiphysics FEM package (COMSOL I, COMSOL multiphysics reference manual, version 5.3, COMSOL AB, 2018, www.comsol.com), for the cases of absolute and differential probes are checked for their extent of validity.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite Element Modelling of a Reflection Differential Split-D Eddy Current Probe Scanning Surface Notches

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The advantages of using this type of probe configuration become more pronounced when inspecting ferromagnetic materials (e.g., martensitic steels), since the ECT signals detected from these materials could be very noisy. Different studies have investigated the performance of split-D probes through model-based approaches [12][13][14][15][16][17], while some others have tried to perform modelbased inversion based on the flaws scanned by the probes [18][19][20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study of the Automated Eddy Current Detection of Cracks in Steel Plates

Mohseni

Boukani²,

França

et al. 2019

J Nondestruct Eval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Applying life estimation approaches to determine in-service life of structures and plan the inspection schedules accordingly are becoming acceptable safety design procedures in aerospace. However, these design systems shall be fed with reliable parameters related to material properties, loading conditions and defect characteristics. In this context, the role of nondestructive (NDT) testing reliability is of high importance in detecting and sizing defects. Eddy current test (ECT) is an electromagnetic NDT method frequently used to inspect tiny surface fatigue cracks in sensitive industries. Owing to the new advances in robotic technologies, there is a trend to integrate the ECT into automated systems to perform NDT inspections more efficiently. In fact, ECT can be effectively automated as to increase the coverage, repeatability and scanning speed. The reliability of ECT scanning, however, should be thoroughly investigated and compared to conventional modes of applications to obtain a better understanding of the advantages and shortcomings related to this technique. In this contribution, a series of manual and automated ECT tests are carried out on a set of samples using a split-D reflection differential surface probe. The study investigates the level of noise recorded in each technique and discuss its dependency on different parameters, such as surface roughness and frequency. Afterwards, a description of the effect of crack orientation on ECT signal amplitude is provided through experimental tests and finite element simulations. Finally, the reliability of each ECT technique is investigated by means of probability of detection (POD) curves. POD parameters are then extracted and compared to examine the effect of scanning index, frequency and automation on detection reliability.

show abstract

Split D differential probe model validation using an impedance analyzer

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Finite Element Modelling of a Reflection Differential Split-D Eddy Current Probe Scanning Surface Notches

Finite Element Modelling of a Reflection Differential Split-D Eddy Current Probe Scanning Surface Notches

A Study of the Automated Eddy Current Detection of Cracks in Steel Plates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About