2017
DOI: 10.1137/16m1061199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splines Are Universal Solutions of Linear Inverse Problems with Generalized TV Regularization

Abstract: Abstract. Splines come in a variety of flavors that can be characterized in terms of some differential operator L. The simplest piecewise-constant model corresponds to the derivative operator. Likewise, one can extend the traditional notion of total variation by considering more general operators than the derivative. This results in the definitions of a generalized total variation seminorm and its corresponding native space, which is further identified as the direct sum of two Banach spaces. We then prove that… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
190
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
190
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can furthermore characterize the extremal points of the ball associated to φ N according to the following theorem. Note that a similar result was also obtained by [31] and [23] in different settings and more restrictive hypotheses. For this purpose, for x ∈ R d , denote by G x the fundamental solution G translated by x, i.e., such that LG x = δ x .…”
Section: Existence Of a Sparse Minimizersupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can furthermore characterize the extremal points of the ball associated to φ N according to the following theorem. Note that a similar result was also obtained by [31] and [23] in different settings and more restrictive hypotheses. For this purpose, for x ∈ R d , denote by G x the fundamental solution G translated by x, i.e., such that LG x = δ x .…”
Section: Existence Of a Sparse Minimizersupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It also justifies once more the usage of locally convex spaces in the abstract theory. In this setting, as an application of our main theorem, we are able to recover the same result as in [31] and [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can consider an additional system of n neighborhoods i p , i = 1, … , n, each separated by an angle θ and all neighbors located at the same distance d from p. Following this convention, Figure 2B shows the neighborhood 1 p and Figure 2C illustrate the collection of all such n + 1 neighborhoods of p. These additional neighbors (U(x, y) in Figure 2D, for example) can be estimated from the known neighboring pixel values (red and black pixels) using standard interpolators such as the bilinear interpolator or bicubic spline interpolator. [29][30][31][32][33] For detailed steps, the reader may refer to the Extended Neighborhoods section in the Supporting Information file.…”
Section: Extended Neighborhood and Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximal splitting algorithms are suitable for such a class of tasks. We utilize the Condat proximal algorithm [26], which is able to solve (among more general formulations) problems of the type The connection between (15) and (12) is provided via assigning h 1 = · 21 , h 2 = λ · 21 , L 1 = L v , L 2 = L h reshape(·). To fit the formulation (15), the feasible set is recast in the unconstrained form using the indicator function h 3 = ι {z: y−z 2≤δ} , where ι C denotes the indicator function of a convex set C [27].…”
Section: Numerical Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%