2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep12940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splenic red pulp macrophages are intrinsically superparamagnetic and contaminate magnetic cell isolates

Abstract: A main function of splenic red pulp macrophages is the degradation of damaged or aged erythrocytes. Here we show that these macrophages accumulate ferrimagnetic iron oxides that render them intrinsically superparamagnetic. Consequently, these cells routinely contaminate splenic cell isolates obtained with the use of MCS, a technique that has been widely used in immunological research for decades. These contaminations can profoundly alter experimental results. In mice deficient for the transcription factor SpiC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we now demonstrate that the initially identified MR-expressing cells represent F4/80 + CD11b − CD68 + red pulp macrophages (RPMs) (28) (Fig. S7 B and C), confirming previous observations by others (29,30). However, because the role of RPMs in cross-priming is unclear, the physiological relevance of MR expression in these cells in terms of cross-presentation remains elusive.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Here, we now demonstrate that the initially identified MR-expressing cells represent F4/80 + CD11b − CD68 + red pulp macrophages (RPMs) (28) (Fig. S7 B and C), confirming previous observations by others (29,30). However, because the role of RPMs in cross-priming is unclear, the physiological relevance of MR expression in these cells in terms of cross-presentation remains elusive.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For example, resting splenic red pulp macrophages are much more prone to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to exogenous stimuli as bone marrow macrophages (Wang et al, 2013). Although being more 'M1 polarized', RPM still express large amounts of the C-type lectin CD206, which is usually considered a marker for M2-polarized macrophages (Franken et al, 2015;Gordon, 2003). Because of the transcriptional diversity observed between the different macrophage subsets, it is of course not surprising that differences in the ability of these cells to react to exogenous inflammatory stimuli can be observed -it is clear that this is merely one aspect of the functional differences between these cells .…”
Section: Macrophages In Infections 477mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors analysed the transcriptome of several tissue macrophage populations and tried to pinpoint the differences between macrophages and DC, as classical markers do not allow to reliably distinguish macrophages from DCs in most tissues . The integrin CD11c, for example, which is often employed as a DC marker by scientists working with mouse models, is also expressed by splenic red pulp macrophages, alveolar macrophages and Langerhans cells (Franken et al, 2015;Probst et al, 2005;Romani et al, 2003), while the wellknown macrophage marker F4/80, on the other hand, is also expressed at low levels by the most numerous splenic DC subset, the CD4 + CD11b + cDCs (Leenen et al, 1998;Franken et al, 2015). While CD64 (FcyRI) and MerTK were proposed as genes that represent a macrophage core signature, setting macrophages and DCs apart, it was initially hard for them to find genes that were expressed in all macrophage populations, but not in classical DCs.…”
Section: Macrophages In Infections 477mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations