2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splenic-hepatic elastography index is useful in differentiating between porto-sinusoidal vascular disease and cirrhosis in patients with portal hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in accordance with several published works: the median TE-LSM values of PSVD are 6.2-7.9 kPa, 9,15,16 which is similar to our results that the median TE-LSM value was 10.0 kPa. Ferreira-Silva et al reported that the optimal cut-off value was 12.5 kPa with a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 65.9% and a diagnostic accuracy of 77.9% for PSVD, 16 which is in parallel to our work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in accordance with several published works: the median TE-LSM values of PSVD are 6.2-7.9 kPa, 9,15,16 which is similar to our results that the median TE-LSM value was 10.0 kPa. Ferreira-Silva et al reported that the optimal cut-off value was 12.5 kPa with a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 65.9% and a diagnostic accuracy of 77.9% for PSVD, 16 which is in parallel to our work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…These results are in accordance with several published works: the median TE-LSM values of PSVD are 6.2-7.9 kPa, 9,15,16 which is similar to our results that the median TE-LSM value was 10.0 kPa. Ferreira-Silva et al reported that the optimal cut-off value was 12.5 kPa with a sensitivity of 91.7%, a specificity of 65.9% and a diagnostic accuracy of 77.9% for PSVD, 16 which is in parallel to our work. Furthermore, our results suggested that a TE-LSM value of 10.0 kPa was the rule-in cut-off with a specificity of 95% and a positive likelihood ratio of >10, suggesting more confidence in the diagnosis of PSVD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Spleen stiffness measurements, although not performed in this study protocol, may be useful in the diagnosis of NCPH, alone or in combination with LSM. [21][22][23] The cutoffs of APRI ≥0.73 and Fibrosis-4 index ≥2.72 have been validated…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HVPG and LSM may be helpful to raise suspicion of PH in patients who are at risk for NCPH; however, they may underestimate the degree of PH when compared to patients with cirrhosis. Spleen stiffness measurements, although not performed in this study protocol, may be useful in the diagnosis of NCPH, alone or in combination with LSM 21–23 . The cut‐offs of APRI ≥0.73 and Fibrosis‐4 index ≥2.72 have been validated to predict clinically significant PH in patients with cirrhosis 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis is a major limit, not only because it could have shown how liver disease (i.e., fbrosis staging) would have been underestimated by ultrasound only, but also because signs of portal hypertension (i.e., splenomegaly, dilated portal vein, and collaterals) could have been detected and correlated with the absence/presence of liver cirrhosis at TE. In addition, the application of spleen stifness would have been useful to address more specifcally the severity of portal hypertension, as is complementary to LSM [61], and the spleen stifness measurement (SSM)/LSM ratio could be informative in these cases [62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%