2012
DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0203a05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spitz and Reed nevi: acquired or congenital?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SN are benign melanocytic lesions mostly identified by characteristic clinical and dermoscopic features. Although histopathological and dermoscopic criteria of SN have been considerably described, differential diagnosis of SN and MM is challenging [ 12 14 ]. In our study, most SN and MM in dermoscopy presented a “starburst” type of architecture ( Figure 4 A ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SN are benign melanocytic lesions mostly identified by characteristic clinical and dermoscopic features. Although histopathological and dermoscopic criteria of SN have been considerably described, differential diagnosis of SN and MM is challenging [ 12 14 ]. In our study, most SN and MM in dermoscopy presented a “starburst” type of architecture ( Figure 4 A ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reflectance confocal microscopy, the majority of Spitz nevi present a sharp border cutoff. The confocal image depends on a dermoscopic pattern of Spitz nevus 6–9 . A prevalent starburst pattern mostly reveals a typical honeycombed pattern of the epidermis and only a few pagetoid cells.…”
Section: Aim Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IDS guidelines 6 “Reed” and “Spitz” names are used interchangeably since a pathological distinction between the two entities cannot be made [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%