2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aba533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPISEA: A Python-based Simple Stellar Population Synthesis Code for Star Clusters

Abstract: We present Stellar Population Interface for Stellar Evolution and Atmospheres (SPISEA), an open-source Python package that simulates simple stellar populations. The strength of SPISEA is its modular interface which offers the user control of 13 input properties including (but not limited to) the initial mass function, stellar multiplicity, extinction law, and the metallicity-dependent stellar evolution and atmosphere model grids used. The user also has control over the initial–final mass relation in order to p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Software: Galaxia (Sharma et al 2011), astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al 2013, Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), NumPy (van der Walt et al 2011), SciPy (Virtanen et al 2019), SPISEA (Hosek et al 2020), PopSyCLE (Lam et al 2020), dynesty (Speagle 2020), PyMultiNest (Buchner et al 2014;Feroz et al 2009), dustmaps (Green 2018) , hst1pass (Anderson & King 2006) APPENDIX A. RESCALING OF UNCERTAINTIES For each epoch, hst1pass returns the standard deviation of positions and magnitudes over multiple frames σ x , σ y and σ m , respectively. For our uncertainties, we use the error on the mean σ/ √ N , where N is the number of frames the star is detected in.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Software: Galaxia (Sharma et al 2011), astropy (Astropy Collaboration et al 2013, Matplotlib (Hunter 2007), NumPy (van der Walt et al 2011), SciPy (Virtanen et al 2019), SPISEA (Hosek et al 2020), PopSyCLE (Lam et al 2020), dynesty (Speagle 2020), PyMultiNest (Buchner et al 2014;Feroz et al 2009), dustmaps (Green 2018) , hst1pass (Anderson & King 2006) APPENDIX A. RESCALING OF UNCERTAINTIES For each epoch, hst1pass returns the standard deviation of positions and magnitudes over multiple frames σ x , σ y and σ m , respectively. For our uncertainties, we use the error on the mean σ/ √ N , where N is the number of frames the star is detected in.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate 2), we use the simple stellar population synthesis code SPISEA (Hosek et al 2020) to generate a suite of star clusters to simulate the possible lens population. We use the MISTv1.2 solar metallicity isochrones (Choi et al 2016), get merged atmosphere atmosphere model 22 , Damineli et al (2016) reddening law, and Kroupa (2001) initial mass function (IMF) over the mass range 0.1M < M < 120M .…”
Section: E Constraints On Luminous Stellar Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We fit the K-band spectra of these stars using the methodology outlined above. For this fit, we use a prior on value of log g from Ks photometry from Schödel et al (2010) and the SPISEA isochrone fitting package (Hosek et al 2020) with MIST isochrones (Choi et al 2016). We infer that log g = 0.6 for NE1-1-003 and log g = 0.9 for N2-1-002 (Appendix 8.3).…”
Section: Chemical Abundances In the Galactic Center Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface gravity values for the Galactic center stars were determined using stellar evolutionary models for stars with similar ages and metallicities as the Galactic center. MIST evolutionary models (Choi et al 2016) with merged atmosphere models (more details on merged atmosphere models in Hosek et al 2020) for [M/H]=0.5 and [M/H]=-1.0, at ages of 10 Gyr and 5 Gyr suggested log g=0.6 for NE1-1-003 and log g=0.9 for N2-1-002 would be appropriate for both the subsolar and supersolar metallicity populations at the two stars' respective magnitudes. A sample isochrone used is shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertainties In Surface Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%