1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1963.tb16520.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirometric Studies in Normal Subjects I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 571 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also suggested that normal respiratory function levels vary according to gender [30,31] and the CPF of male participants has been shown to be significantly higher than that of female participants [32]. Therefore, we hypothesized that gender can affect the coefficients in the estimation equation; however, no significant difference in estimation accuracy was found between male and female participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have also suggested that normal respiratory function levels vary according to gender [30,31] and the CPF of male participants has been shown to be significantly higher than that of female participants [32]. Therefore, we hypothesized that gender can affect the coefficients in the estimation equation; however, no significant difference in estimation accuracy was found between male and female participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the respiratory function test, participant height is generally used to determine the normal level of respiratory function [30,31] and a relationship between CPF and height has been reported [32]. Based on these previous studies, we hypothesized that height affects CPS ; however, in Equation (2), in which the coefficient α of Equation (1) was replaced by a linear function of height, the 95% CI of the multiplication coefficient α 1 onto the height ranged from −0.112 to 0.02, including 0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the lung function values were adjusted for age and sex by the use of reference values (16,17), these factors were not considered as potential confounders, but only atopy and smoking were used to adjust the effect estimates. All models were adjusted for these factors unless otherwise stated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung volumes were determined by the helium gas dilution method, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (D LCO ) was measured by the single-breath method. The values obtained were expressed as a percentage of the predicted values [15]. Arterial blood samples obtained in room air were analyzed by a standard blood gas analyzer (ABL800, Radiometer Corp., Copenhagen, Denmark).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%