2007
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirituality, religion and health: evidence and research directions

Abstract: Levels of spirituality and religious beliefs and behaviour are relatively high in Australia, although lower than those in the United States. There is mounting scientific evidence of a positive association between religious involvement and multiple indicators of health. The strongest evidence exists for the association between religious attendance and mortality, with higher levels of attendance predictive of a strong, consistent and often graded reduction in mortality risk. Negative effects of religion on healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(77 reference statements)
3
74
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the primary aim of this study was to combine, in a single model, several competing explanations for the long-recognized religiosity-to-mortality association. The model confirms a direct association between church activity and mortality that is consistent with other literature with age controlled (Hummer, Ellison, Rogers, Moulton, & Romero, 2004; Lee, Stacey, & Fraser, 2003; Strawbridge et al, 1997; Williams & Sternthal, 2007). The model adds to the existing literature by identifying the indirect paths between religious engagement and mortality as church activity, positive social support, negative emotionality, diet, and exercise (i.e., lifestyle) in that order.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As such, the primary aim of this study was to combine, in a single model, several competing explanations for the long-recognized religiosity-to-mortality association. The model confirms a direct association between church activity and mortality that is consistent with other literature with age controlled (Hummer, Ellison, Rogers, Moulton, & Romero, 2004; Lee, Stacey, & Fraser, 2003; Strawbridge et al, 1997; Williams & Sternthal, 2007). The model adds to the existing literature by identifying the indirect paths between religious engagement and mortality as church activity, positive social support, negative emotionality, diet, and exercise (i.e., lifestyle) in that order.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The association between perceived benefits and the two outcome measures were then tested in multiple variable models adjusted for age, gender, marital status, parkrun region by ARIA (major urban area, inner regional area, outer regional area) [31], and satisfaction with spirituality. The latter has been considered as a covariate due to the positive association between spirituality/religion and multiple indicators of health, in particular reduce risk of mortality [32]. The effect of spirituality has been attributed to the many “ingredients” it can provide that impact on wellbeing, including changes in life purpose, social support, coping mechanisms and resilience to stress [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this article, we have concentrated on two particular aspects of the religious experience: importance placed on religion and frequency of participation in religious events. These two issues have been identified by researchers studying religion as vital aspects of religious understanding in social research (Greenfield and Marks 2007, Williams and Sternthal 2007). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%