2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirals in protoplanetary disks from photon travel time

Abstract: Spiral structures are a common feature in scattered-light images of protoplanetary disks, and of great interest as possible tracers of the presence of planets. However, other mechanisms have been put forward to explain them, including self-gravity, disk-envelope interactions, and dead zone boundaries. These mechanisms explain many spirals very well, but are unable to easily account for very loosely wound spirals and single spiral arms. We study the effect of light travel time on the shape of a shadow cast by a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…• between the inner disk and 80 au (500 mas) if the responsible dust clump is located at 0.15 au (see also Kama et al 2016). Arguably, some of the shadow lanes show very minor tilts in Figure 2 but the precision and angular resolution of the observations challenge the identification of light travel time effects.…”
Section: Epoch 5 2016mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• between the inner disk and 80 au (500 mas) if the responsible dust clump is located at 0.15 au (see also Kama et al 2016). Arguably, some of the shadow lanes show very minor tilts in Figure 2 but the precision and angular resolution of the observations challenge the identification of light travel time effects.…”
Section: Epoch 5 2016mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While most discs would require uncomfortably high masses to explain the spiral morphology by self-gravity, this is nevertheless a possibility that cannot be excluded. There are also other alternative explanations for spiral arms, such as for example the finite light travel time from the star (Kama et al 2016) or the presence of shadows (Montesinos et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there exist more alternate hypotheses for the generation of these features than sources to test their predictions. Most models include a massive perturbing companion (either a planet or a low-mass star, e.g., Dong et al 2015a andZhu et al 2015); though, notably, some do not require the presence of any companion (e.g., Kama et al 2016;Montesinos et al 2016;Benisty et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%