2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.86.4819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spiraling Bubbles: How Acoustic and Hydrodynamic Forces Compete

Abstract: Experiments to study the effect of acoustic forces on individual bubbles in shear flows have been carried out. In the system that we have used, the competition between acoustic and fluid dynamical forces results in a spiraling bubble trajectory. This dynamics is modeled by expressing the balance between Bjerknes and hydrodynamic forces in terms of an ordinary differential equation model, to which a separation of time scales is applied. The success of this model shows that the simple force-balance approach is s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(78) on solid particles, this scaling is weaker and suggests a possible means for particle-bubble separation in a manner similar to particle-particle separation reported by Rogers et al (2010). Rensen et al (2001) presented an example of how one may control the motion of bubbles in a small fluidic system, where bubbles in a fluid channel are caused to move along a controlled spiral path by the influence of the acoustic radiation passing through the fluid transverse to the fluid's flow in the channel. Tandiono et al (2010) described ultrasonic entrainment of air into closed, filled microfluidic channels through capillary wave generation and air induction through a secondary port, a process unrelated to cavitation which is curiously mentioned in their title.…”
Section: Particles Colloidal Suspensions and Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(78) on solid particles, this scaling is weaker and suggests a possible means for particle-bubble separation in a manner similar to particle-particle separation reported by Rogers et al (2010). Rensen et al (2001) presented an example of how one may control the motion of bubbles in a small fluidic system, where bubbles in a fluid channel are caused to move along a controlled spiral path by the influence of the acoustic radiation passing through the fluid transverse to the fluid's flow in the channel. Tandiono et al (2010) described ultrasonic entrainment of air into closed, filled microfluidic channels through capillary wave generation and air induction through a secondary port, a process unrelated to cavitation which is curiously mentioned in their title.…”
Section: Particles Colloidal Suspensions and Bubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model determines the body velocity v(t) for a class of simple periodic swimming motions. We use a local approximation for the fluid force on each leg and the body, similar to those used in ordinary differential equation models of rising bubbles and falling paper (Rensen et al 2001;Andersen et al 2005). The force on each leg and on the body is proportional to their velocities relative to the fluid, raised to the power 1 or 2.…”
Section: Drag Coefficient Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting phenomenon revealed by both acoustic [18], [19] and optical [11], [12], [20]- [22] observations is yielded by the primary US radiation force, also known as the Bjerknes force [23]. The radiation force originates from the phase difference between the driving pressure and the volume oscillation of a bubble.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early literature, approaches of this method are described in which the equations were linearized under the assumption of small radial motion (acoustic limit) [18], [20], [24], [25]. The time-domain evaluation of the differential equations [11], [26], [27] has later allowed for a better accounting of transient effects [28], as well as for the influence of the so-called added mass force, that considers the fluid motion surrounding the cavity [11], [26], [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%