2009
DOI: 10.1002/9783527628988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spins in Optically Active Quantum Dots

Abstract: Self-Assembled Quantum Dots 21 2.3.1 Strain-Driven Self-Alignment 22 2.3.2 Optical Properties and QD Shell Structure 24 2.4 Alternative Epitaxial Quantum Dot Systems 27 2.4.1 Electrically Gated Quantum Dots 27 2.4.2 Advanced MBE Techniques 29 2.4.3 Nanowire Quantum Dots 31 2.5 Chemically-Synthesized Quantum Dots 32 2.5.1 Colloidal Growth 33 2.5.2 Energy Level Structure and Optical Properties 34 3 Theory of Confined States in Quantum Dots 39 3.1 Band Structure of III-V Semiconductors 39 3.1.1 Effective Mass of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to self-assembled QDs, gate-defined systems cannot confine electrons and holes at the same time and are therefore optically inactive [27]. Currently, experiments are almost exclusively carried out on gated 2DEGs, and new experimental challenges may be encountered when 2D hole gases are used instead [192].…”
Section: Dynamic Nuclear Polarization and Alternative Host Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As opposed to self-assembled QDs, gate-defined systems cannot confine electrons and holes at the same time and are therefore optically inactive [27]. Currently, experiments are almost exclusively carried out on gated 2DEGs, and new experimental challenges may be encountered when 2D hole gases are used instead [192].…”
Section: Dynamic Nuclear Polarization and Alternative Host Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such QDs are typically lens-shaped, with heights of ∼ 5 nm (growth direction) and diameters ∼ 20 nm, and confinement results from the difference in the conduction and valence band edges of the involved materials. Alternatively, interface fluctuation QDs arise from monolayer fluctuations in thin quantum wells, typically resulting in GaAs dots within AlGaAs [27]. The second category, lateral QDs, is based on two-dimensional electron and hole gases (2DEGs, 2DHGs), which exist in heterostructures from materials with suitable band properties and additional dopants.…”
Section: Promising Quantum Dot Structures Definition Of Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,2 It is relatively isolated from the solid state effects and at the same time is accessible for coherent manipulation and can be interfaced optically. The coherence in this system is mainly limited by the hyperfine coupling with the nuclear spin bath.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In this respect, the need to selectively rotate a specific spin qubit within a quantum register while simultaneously controlling interactions between spins is challenging. Such selective addressing requires that each qubit has a unique resonance frequency or calls for highly local ( 100 nm) time-dependent magnetic fields to selectively rotate a specific qubit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%