2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPInS, a pipeline for massive stellar parameter inference

Abstract: Context. Stellar parameters are required in a variety of contexts, ranging from the characterisation of exoplanets to Galactic archaeology. Among them, the age of stars cannot be directly measured, while the mass and radius can be measured in some particular cases (e.g. binary systems, interferometry). More generally, stellar ages, masses, and radii have to be inferred from stellar evolution models by appropriate techniques. Aims. We have designed a Python tool named SPInS. It takes a set of photometric, spect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can trace most differences compared with the literature to the different input T eff and L estimates. To support this statement, we compared FLAME's ages to the ones we obtained with the SPinS public code (Lebreton & Reese 2020). We generated random sets of 600 stars with the SPinS code using the same Gaia DR3 APs that FLAME uses and compared the output ages in four different magnitude intervals.…”
Section: Mass Age and Evolution Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can trace most differences compared with the literature to the different input T eff and L estimates. To support this statement, we compared FLAME's ages to the ones we obtained with the SPinS public code (Lebreton & Reese 2020). We generated random sets of 600 stars with the SPinS code using the same Gaia DR3 APs that FLAME uses and compared the output ages in four different magnitude intervals.…”
Section: Mass Age and Evolution Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A color cut-off bias could also be part of the explanation for this effect, excluding the low-log-g stars with high metallicity and the high-log-g stars with low metallicity, as discussed in Mortier et al (2013); Adibekyan (2019). We also obtained stellar masses for the sample with global parameters fitting, using evolutionary tracks from Pietrinferni et al (2004), using the SPInS software (Lebreton & Reese 2020). The distribution ranges approximately from 0.75 to 4 M , with a maximum around 2 M .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A color cut-off bias could also be part of the explanation for this effect, excluding the low-logg stars with high metallicity and the high-log-g stars with low metallicity, as discussed in Mortier et al (2013); Adibekyan (2019). We also obtained stellar masses for the sample with global parameters fitting, using evolutionary tracks from Pietrinferni et al ( 2004), using the SPInS software (Lebreton & Reese 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, together with the stellar evolutionary tracks at solar metallicity of Pietrinferni et al ( 2004) 6 . Those were used to estimate the masses of our stars using the SPInS software (Lebreton & Reese 2020) 7 . The approach compares the luminosity, effective temperature, logarithm of surface gravity, and [Fe/H] of individual objects to theoretical evolutionary tracks and accounts for the observational errors in these four quantities.…”
Section: Stellar Luminosities Radii and Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%