2005
DOI: 10.4000/books.enseditions.6248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinoza. État et religion

Abstract: puissant, et lui imposant des directives. Les empereurs, durant des siècles, n'ont pu en venir à bout. Alors que cette situation a été la source d'innombrables polémiques, notamment au moment de la Réforme, Spinoza a l'originalité de prendre cet événement pour objet et de s'interroger sur ses causes. Pourquoi l'Église romaine at -elle duré si longtemps et-sauf dans les pays protestants-dure-t-elle encore ? cette question est symétrique de celle qui concerne la religion juive après l'État des Hébreux. Comment u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding this chapter Pierre-François Moreau writes that "on bascule (…) de la question des rapports État/Église à la question des rapports État/individu, ou plus exactement, puisqu'ils ne sont nullement posés dans la forme du droit subjectif, à la question des rapports de l'État avec lui-même -de l'État comme appareil à l'État comme force de production intellectuelle et sociale." 22 Thus, it seems like there we have the liberal Thomasius stressing individualism, but at the same time he was perhaps also looking to advance a certain social identity that could bring out national interests and strengthen the state? WS: Well, I stressed the tensions in Thomasius's ideas, but one thing remains clear: there's no way for him to accept or to tolerate atheism, for Pufendorfian reasons.…”
Section: A Conversation With Winfried Schröderunclassified
“…Regarding this chapter Pierre-François Moreau writes that "on bascule (…) de la question des rapports État/Église à la question des rapports État/individu, ou plus exactement, puisqu'ils ne sont nullement posés dans la forme du droit subjectif, à la question des rapports de l'État avec lui-même -de l'État comme appareil à l'État comme force de production intellectuelle et sociale." 22 Thus, it seems like there we have the liberal Thomasius stressing individualism, but at the same time he was perhaps also looking to advance a certain social identity that could bring out national interests and strengthen the state? WS: Well, I stressed the tensions in Thomasius's ideas, but one thing remains clear: there's no way for him to accept or to tolerate atheism, for Pufendorfian reasons.…”
Section: A Conversation With Winfried Schröderunclassified
“…Como a natureza humana é sempre e em toda parte a mesma, não há um momento histórico privilegiado, nem povo mais perto de Deus que os outros; a história bíblica não nos mostra uma verdadeira precedência da Igreja sobre o Magistrado; e ela se divide em épocas que, se ela mantém sua unidade em parecer como realização diferida de um erro inicial [a atribuição do sacerdote aos Levitas, em seguida, Moisés tinha reservado aos primogênitos de cada família de todas as tribos], não tem menos cada uma seu próprio rosto 26 .…”
Section: Dois Modelos Para a Secularização Da História Judia: Paradigunclassified
“…These issues relatively complicate the SRM modelling process. Generally, numerical methods such as Finite Elements Method (FEA), adopted here, are used to handle modelling and optimization problems [5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%