2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30802-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinning-enabled wireless amphibious origami millirobot

Abstract: Wireless millimeter-scale origami robots have recently been explored with great potential for biomedical applications. Existing millimeter-scale origami devices usually require separate geometrical components for locomotion and functions. Additionally, none of them can achieve both on-ground and in-water locomotion. Here we report a magnetically actuated amphibious origami millirobot that integrates capabilities of spinning-enabled multimodal locomotion, delivery of liquid medicine, and cargo transportation wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most other bots that are biologically inspired but non-organic tend to have sizes that are visible to the naked eye with microbots having a diameter ∼260 micrometers 90 , and crab-inspired robots around 500-700 micrometers 91 are thus a few times the size of an average Anthrobot. Other bots have had larger sizes, like the magnetically controlled soft-body milirobot ∼3.7 mm 92 , the water droplet manipulating magnetic-actuated robot ∼ 2.4 mm 93 and the origami milirobot ∼6-8 mm 94 of which the largest was the aforementioned insect-inspired robot with a size of <20 mm=20000 micrometer 89 , which is tens to hundreds of times the size of the Anthrobots. Like many modern robotics platforms, they are not single-scale, deterministic, human-programmed, inorganic devices 95101 , but instead offer a tantalizing mix of baseline competencies that could eventually be managed and augmented by environmental stimuli and the addition of smart materials, circuits, and behavior-shaping protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most other bots that are biologically inspired but non-organic tend to have sizes that are visible to the naked eye with microbots having a diameter ∼260 micrometers 90 , and crab-inspired robots around 500-700 micrometers 91 are thus a few times the size of an average Anthrobot. Other bots have had larger sizes, like the magnetically controlled soft-body milirobot ∼3.7 mm 92 , the water droplet manipulating magnetic-actuated robot ∼ 2.4 mm 93 and the origami milirobot ∼6-8 mm 94 of which the largest was the aforementioned insect-inspired robot with a size of <20 mm=20000 micrometer 89 , which is tens to hundreds of times the size of the Anthrobots. Like many modern robotics platforms, they are not single-scale, deterministic, human-programmed, inorganic devices 95101 , but instead offer a tantalizing mix of baseline competencies that could eventually be managed and augmented by environmental stimuli and the addition of smart materials, circuits, and behavior-shaping protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative aquatic speed is ≈2.3 BL s –1 , which is not that fast as the terrestrial speed, but still better than most amphibious robots. It is worth noting that some robots are excited by external magnetic field, [ 18 , 57 ] which facilitates their miniaturization. However, the excitation source is not possible to be integrated.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robot exhibits superior performance on relative motion speed compared with other typical amphibious robots. [2,10,12,14,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In particular, the relative terrestrial speed reaches to ≈10.9 BL s -1 , which shows the significant superiority of this design. The relative aquatic speed is ≈2.3 BL s -1 , which is not that fast as the terrestrial speed, but still better than most amphibious robots.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately half of previous small-scale, flexible magnetic robots demonstrated cargo transportation capabilities (see Table S1, Supporting Information), including impressive reports of robots capable of transporting cargos 20 times the robot body weight and three times the robot volume (Wu et al, 2022), and more than 100 times robot body weight (Lu et al, 2018). However, only five identified robots (Ze et al, 2022b;Joyee and Pan, 2019b;Hu et al, 2018;Ze et al, 2022a;Wu et al, 2022) included an internal compartment. Advantages of a compartment include easier integration and protection in harsh environments.…”
Section: Robot and Compartment Sizementioning
confidence: 99%