The Miocene Table Cape vent erupted a diverse mantle-crust xenolith suite within its fractionated nephclinitic matrix. Assemblages include mantle metaperidotites, garnet-metawebsterites and rarer garnet-metadinopyroxcnites, garnet-metawehrlires, metawcbstetites and crustal two-pyroxene granulites. Most metapyroxenites and granulites represent the Ti-Al-bearing augite suite and their bulk geochemistry indicates transitional olivine basalt magmatic affinities. Metasomatised, hydrous lithologies are only rarely present. Co-existing pyroxenes in the xenoliths provide re-equilibration temperature estimates from 860-1075°C (for the whole suite) and temperature-pressure estimates for the garnet metawebsterites from 1055-1070°C and 1.2-1.4 GPa. This gives a Miocene mantle geotherm gradient at least 80-l 30°C higher than the Southeast Australian (SEA) western Victorian geotherms. However, considerations of Moho depths from new seismic surveys below Table Cape (�32 km) suggest that the indicated geotherm is more strongly pcrrurbed in its lower levels than at the mantle-crust transition. This localised perturbation is attributed to adjacent magma chamber activity in the mantle (Boat Harbour basalts) just prior to Table Cape vent activity. Tasmanian Miocene geotherms (Table Cape, Bow Hill) achieve relatively high gradients and reinforce sugges tions of local variation in East Australian geothermal gradients. They illustrate the potential complexities in comparing xenolith-derived geotherms from diff erent areas in general, both from thermometer/barometer selection and from associated magmatic heat inputs.