2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000197833.67832.e7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Severe Preeclampsia: A Prospective Randomized, Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…elective and emergency situations [18,19]. Blockade of light touch sensation from S5 to T5 should avoid the need for supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia.…”
Section: Epidural Top-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…elective and emergency situations [18,19]. Blockade of light touch sensation from S5 to T5 should avoid the need for supplementation or conversion to general anaesthesia.…”
Section: Epidural Top-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuraxial blockade for patients with pre-eclampsia undergoing cesarean section is a safe and potent anesthetic technique [1]. Fast onset, higher level blockade, lower failure rates, and cost-effectiveness are main causes that make spinal block is the preferred technique although it has numerous side effects which my occur intra operative as hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, short period of block and postoperative complications as nausea, vomiting, shivering, prurites paresthesia, post dural puncture headache (PDPH), allergy, voiding difficulty and shortness of postoperative analgesia [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The optimal anesthetic technique for cesarean delivery in women with severe preeclampsia remains controversial. 4,5 A more relevant and interesting problem is how we can improve monitoring of other hemodynamic parameters in preeclamptic parturients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%