2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal presynaptic inhibition in pain control

Abstract: The gate control theory proposed that the nociceptive sensory information transmitted to the brain relies on an interplay between the inputs from nociceptive and non-nociceptive primary afferent fibers. Both inputs are normally under strong inhibitory control in the spinal cord. Under healthy conditions, presynaptic inhibition activated by non-nociceptive fibers modulates the afferent input from nociceptive fibers onto spinal cord neurons, while postsynaptic inhibition controls the excitability of dorsal horn … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been established that some primary sensory afferents may activate spinal interneurons and release GABA [17]. GABA activates GABA A receptors located in primary afferent terminals and then modulates the afferent input from DRG neurons into nociceptive-specific projection neurons (presynaptic inhibition) [8,9]. Indeed, the activation of spinal GABAergic circuits attenuates nociceptive process [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that some primary sensory afferents may activate spinal interneurons and release GABA [17]. GABA activates GABA A receptors located in primary afferent terminals and then modulates the afferent input from DRG neurons into nociceptive-specific projection neurons (presynaptic inhibition) [8,9]. Indeed, the activation of spinal GABAergic circuits attenuates nociceptive process [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most superficial layer neurons show polysynaptic events upon bicuculline treatment in our hands ("dis-inhibition", see Figures 6B and 6D for examples, and (Torsney and MacDermott, 2006)), it is difficult for us to determine and compare the peak currents of monosynaptic responses with or without bicuculline treatment. Thus, we could not determine the contribution of GABA A receptors (Guo and Hu, 2014;Paul et al, 2012) in this regard. In short, given that most previously characterized classes of DH inhibitory interneurons are located in more superficial DH layers (Lu and Perl, 2003;Todd, 2010;Yasaka et al, 2010), our results provide novel insight into the circuits and functions of deep layer DH inhibitory interneurons.…”
Section: Early Ret+ Ddh Neurons Are a New Functional Class Of Spinal mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Increasing spinal inhibition with intrathecal GABA or by activation of inhibitory interneurons results in an antinociceptive effect, while blocking inhibitory transmission, e.g. by selective ablation of glycinergic dorsal horn interneurons, leads to lowered pain thresholds and the development of hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia 50, 69 . Mechanisms of disinhibition include reduced descending inhibitory control, loss of GABAergic or glycinergic interneurons through cell death, reduced GABA or GABA-synthesizing enzyme (e.g.…”
Section: Pain Mechanisms (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanisms of disinhibition include reduced descending inhibitory control, loss of GABAergic or glycinergic interneurons through cell death, reduced GABA or GABA-synthesizing enzyme (e.g. glutamate decarboxylase), and altered properties of GABA A receptors, glycinergic receptors and cation-chloride cotransporters 69, 92 . Restoring spinal cord inhibition by, for example, suptype-specific GABA receptor agonists, may offer the opportunity to reduce pain without limiting side effects like sedation 162 .…”
Section: Pain Mechanisms (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%