2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal instrumentation for interfacet locking injuries of the subaxial cervical spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, despite equal results in terms of fusion rate, recovery, alignment, or long-term complaints between anterior and posterior approaches [ 14 , 16 , 17 ], the anterior approach in acute cervical dislocations is preferred by some authors because of the risk of disc herniation impinging the cord occurring when reducing the dislocation by a posterior approach [ 15 , 17 , 18 ]. A vast majority of patients were reduced (in recent dislocations) by an anterior approach in a first stage [ 14 , 17 ]; a second stage by a posterior approach could be added to increase the stability [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, despite equal results in terms of fusion rate, recovery, alignment, or long-term complaints between anterior and posterior approaches [ 14 , 16 , 17 ], the anterior approach in acute cervical dislocations is preferred by some authors because of the risk of disc herniation impinging the cord occurring when reducing the dislocation by a posterior approach [ 15 , 17 , 18 ]. A vast majority of patients were reduced (in recent dislocations) by an anterior approach in a first stage [ 14 , 17 ]; a second stage by a posterior approach could be added to increase the stability [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical treatment of old fracture and dislocation of the lower cervical spine has been controversial [ 13 , 14 ]. Bartel et al recommend the posterior-anterior-posterior surgery for the treatment of old fracture and dislocation of the lower cervical spine [ 8 ], while other scholars report that the anterior-posterior surgery is the best choice for this kind of injury [ 15 , 16 ]. However, combined surgery has the disadvantages of multiple postures and great trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, if a facet dislocation, with or without fracture, is irreducible by traction, posterior approach would be choose initially. 1,5,7,17,23 The only case where anterior approach is clearly chosen is when an anterior decompression is required (slipped disc, burst fractures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%