2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/406159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Fusion in the Next Generation: Gene and Cell Therapy Approaches

Abstract: Bone fusion represents a challenge in the orthopedics practice, being especially indicated for spine disorders. Spinal fusion can be defined as the bony union between two vertebral bodies obtained through the surgical introduction of an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic compound. Autogenous bone graft provides all these three qualities and is considered the gold standard. However, a high morbidity is associated with the harvest procedure. Intensive research efforts have been spent during the last… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mesenchymal stromal cell transplants are continually evaluated for safety and efficacy in animal models and clinical trials, numerous factors will need to be optimized: area of stromal cell harvest, intrinsic expression or extrinsic expression of certain growth factors and proinflammatory cytokines such as BMP, TGFb, and lipopolysaccharides, and material and construction of scaffolds on which the cells are supported. [34][35][36][37][38] If a successful solution is found in a clinical trial that could replace currently used autograft, allograft, and allograft substitute options, a cost-benefit analysis will be a necessary step in determining whether mesenchymal stromal cell transplants will become the new standard of care. Time invested in harvesting from bone marrow or adipose tissue, time for expansion of MSCs in culture, maintaining staff highly knowledgeable in the fields of tissue engineering and material science are all critical factors that play into this decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mesenchymal stromal cell transplants are continually evaluated for safety and efficacy in animal models and clinical trials, numerous factors will need to be optimized: area of stromal cell harvest, intrinsic expression or extrinsic expression of certain growth factors and proinflammatory cytokines such as BMP, TGFb, and lipopolysaccharides, and material and construction of scaffolds on which the cells are supported. [34][35][36][37][38] If a successful solution is found in a clinical trial that could replace currently used autograft, allograft, and allograft substitute options, a cost-benefit analysis will be a necessary step in determining whether mesenchymal stromal cell transplants will become the new standard of care. Time invested in harvesting from bone marrow or adipose tissue, time for expansion of MSCs in culture, maintaining staff highly knowledgeable in the fields of tissue engineering and material science are all critical factors that play into this decision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene therapy approaches aim to deliver osteoinductive genes locally to induce bone formation and improve spinal fusion, with several approaches having been tried [134]. The vectors used for gene therapy approaches consist of an adenoviral vector, lentiviral vector, naked deoxyribonucleic acid, liposomes, and plasmids.…”
Section: Gene Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best effective, clinically available, therapeutic options for skeletal reconstruction are currently restricted to autologous and allogeneic bone grafts, along with synthetic bone substitutes [2][3][4][5][6]. The main disadvantage of bone autografts resides in the morbidity of the donor site, where a skeletal defect is created, especially in the presence of overall poor clinical conditions, along with the limited source availability [6]. Furthermore, the complexity of autograft procedures raises other technical issues in selected skeletal sites [7].The use of allogenic bone is inherently associated with morbidities deriving from residual immune-related and infectious burden, along with reduced cost-effectiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%