2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00124.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Mouse Chronic Neuropathic Pain Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous mouse studies, a single epidural cathode electrode was used for DCS, with the anode placed in the abdomen. 61 The average motor threshold amplitude reported in that study was 730 μA, which is an order of magnitude greater than what we measured (71 μA). We attribute this discrepancy to the bipolar architecture of our electrode, resulting in more focal electrical fields and greater activation of dorsal column axons while minimizing unwanted heat generation and electrolysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In previous mouse studies, a single epidural cathode electrode was used for DCS, with the anode placed in the abdomen. 61 The average motor threshold amplitude reported in that study was 730 μA, which is an order of magnitude greater than what we measured (71 μA). We attribute this discrepancy to the bipolar architecture of our electrode, resulting in more focal electrical fields and greater activation of dorsal column axons while minimizing unwanted heat generation and electrolysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Though tonic SCS successfully decreased pain sensitivity, SCS treatment typically did not return pain levels in rats back to pre-injury control levels. In a mouse model, SCS treatment following PSNL lesions proved particularly efficacious, with 80% of mice in one study [34] and 100% of mice in another study [25] responding positively to tonic SCS treatment. In this latter study, unlike the typical rat study, the mice returned to baseline levels of paw withdrawal following SCS treatment.…”
Section: Scs In Partial Nerve Injury Modelsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In subsequent studies that further explored its mechanisms, it was demonstrated that DRG neuromodulation therapy [high-frequency electrical nerve stimulation (HFES)] applied in in vitro (10 kHz, 2 mA) or in vivo (20.6 kHz) systems was able to reduce the production of high-mobility group Box-1 (HMGB1), CGRP, and SP peripherally as well as reduce pain, thus indicating reduced nociceptor neuron activity, suggesting that HFES may reset sensory neurons to a less pro-inflammatory state [ 62 ], highlighting a potential mechanism for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Moreover, in rats with SNI procedure, high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency (HVPRF) in the DRG (L 5 ; 45–100 V) reduced pain and induced autophagy in spinal cord microglia, as well as reduced TNF-α and increased IL-10 were observed in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, with additional improvements in DRG morphology [ 44 ]. Similar to these findings, DRG electrical stimulation (GFS—ganglionic field stimulation) could attenuate the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal response to acute noxious stimulation in brain regions associated with painful stimuli in a rat model [ 105 ].…”
Section: Neuromodulation Therapies Targeting Drg and The Spinal Cord ...mentioning
confidence: 99%