2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-019-03039-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal cord injury: pathophysiology, treatment strategies, associated challenges, and future implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
127
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 245 publications
0
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile impairment occurs in millions of aging and mature adults, worldwide, as a result of neuromuscular and neurodegenerative disease (Cowling & Thielemans, ; Pipis, Rossor, Laura, & Reilly, ) as well as chronic and traumatic injury to the brain and/or spinal cord (Alizadeh, Dyck, & Karimi‐Abdolrezaee, ; New & Biering‐Sorensen, ). Traditional therapies have sought to restore mobility through direct action on neuronal cells (Silva, Sousa, Reis, & Salgado, ; Venkatesh, Ghosh, Mullick, Manivasagam, & Sen, ), but have reported modest recovery with considerable disparity in mobility outcomes (Filipp et al, ; Gupta, Jaiswal, Norman, & Depaul, ). Mounting evidence suggests that both motor deficit and recovery in adults depend largely upon the plasticity of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a biochemical synapse that transduces electrical impulses from the brain into voluntary contraction of striated muscle (Burns et al, ; Khorasanizadeh et al, ; Lepore, Casola, Dobrowolny, & Musaro, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile impairment occurs in millions of aging and mature adults, worldwide, as a result of neuromuscular and neurodegenerative disease (Cowling & Thielemans, ; Pipis, Rossor, Laura, & Reilly, ) as well as chronic and traumatic injury to the brain and/or spinal cord (Alizadeh, Dyck, & Karimi‐Abdolrezaee, ; New & Biering‐Sorensen, ). Traditional therapies have sought to restore mobility through direct action on neuronal cells (Silva, Sousa, Reis, & Salgado, ; Venkatesh, Ghosh, Mullick, Manivasagam, & Sen, ), but have reported modest recovery with considerable disparity in mobility outcomes (Filipp et al, ; Gupta, Jaiswal, Norman, & Depaul, ). Mounting evidence suggests that both motor deficit and recovery in adults depend largely upon the plasticity of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a biochemical synapse that transduces electrical impulses from the brain into voluntary contraction of striated muscle (Burns et al, ; Khorasanizadeh et al, ; Lepore, Casola, Dobrowolny, & Musaro, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the stem cell‐based transplantation therapy has been purported to replace lost neurons and glial cells after SCI at the injury site (Carelli et al, 2014; Venkatesh et al, 2019). However, stem cell‐based transplantation is mainly limited by the low survival rate of the grafted stem cells and tumor formation risk due to its multiple differentiation potential (Shi et al, 2016; de Luca et al, 2015; Kolar et al, 2014).…”
Section: Chitosan Scaffold Protects Grafted Stem Cells In Vitro and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the stem cell-based transplantation therapy has been purported to replace lost neurons and glial cells after SCI at the injury site (Carelli et al, 2014;Venkatesh et al, 2019). However, stem cellbased transplantation is mainly limited by the low survival rate of the grafted stem cells and tumor formation risk due to its multiple differentiation potential (Shi et al, 2016;de Luca et al, 2015;Kolar et al, 2014).The combinations of a variety of stem cells and biomaterial scaffold therapies may be necessary for addressing the problems faced in the course of stem cell-based transplantation treatment of the SCI, wherein scaffolds based stem cells present better engraftment and neural differentiation potential than the intralesional injection transplantation group (Ji et al, 2016;Kim and Kim, 2016;Li et al, 2018a,b,d).…”
Section: Chitosan Scaffold Protects Grafted Stem Cells In Vitro and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous, complex, and time‐sensitive pathophysiology of SCI has hampered the identification of the proper set of therapeutic targets for tissue repair. Nevertheless, numerous single or in combination strategies have been investigated to improve functional recovery after SCI (Badhiwala et al, ; Venkatesh, Ghosh, Mullick, Manivasagam, & Sen, ). In this context, cell therapy is particularly well suited to address the multi‐factorial nature of secondary events following SCI, offering a neuroprotective and neuroregenerative competence, which confers a compelling widely investigated clinical potential (Assinck, Duncan, Hilton, Plemel, & Tetzlaff, ; Badner, Siddiqui, & Fehlings, ; Jin, Medress, Azad, Doulames, & Veeravagu, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%