“…We thank Amiram Catz and colleagues for providing an opportunity to clarify any misunderstandings about our recent paper [1] that addressed how to better measure a treatment effect in a clinical trial after spinal cord injury (SCI). To increase the acceptance of SCAR by clinical investigators, the tool evolved through Rasch analysis of current assessment tools that could be modified to track changes in voluntary motor activities during recovery from SCI [1]. Although it incorporates some transformed items from the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), as well as upper extremity motor scores (UEMS), it was not intended to replace SCIM [2].…”