1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf03036986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…,6 Our local experience is that, by using elastic stockings and aggressive fluid loading, the degree of hypotension and use of ephedrine does not differ between patients receiving subarachnoid or epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. 22 Amide local anaesthetics were originally proscribed in MH patients on theoretical grounds based on their in vitro ability to increase calcium efflux from sarcoplasmic reticulum.23 However, this class of drugs has been used extensively in MH patients without demonstrable adverse reactions. 24 As a result, the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) issued a policy statement in 1985 stating that amide local anaesthetics were considered safe in MH patients, z~ Based on this, and since bupivacaine gives a better quality spinal anaesthetic than an ester such as tetracaine, 26 we did not hesitate to use the amide agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,6 Our local experience is that, by using elastic stockings and aggressive fluid loading, the degree of hypotension and use of ephedrine does not differ between patients receiving subarachnoid or epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. 22 Amide local anaesthetics were originally proscribed in MH patients on theoretical grounds based on their in vitro ability to increase calcium efflux from sarcoplasmic reticulum.23 However, this class of drugs has been used extensively in MH patients without demonstrable adverse reactions. 24 As a result, the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) issued a policy statement in 1985 stating that amide local anaesthetics were considered safe in MH patients, z~ Based on this, and since bupivacaine gives a better quality spinal anaesthetic than an ester such as tetracaine, 26 we did not hesitate to use the amide agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage being its simplicity, ease of technique and reliability [3,4] . Till recently bupivacaine was the only drug used after discontinuation of intrathecal lidocaine use [5] .…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%