1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.41.11379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin waves in the flux-phase description of theS=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
106
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We think, however, that a triplon picture which includes the interactions on the quantitative level can give a good description of the Raman response. A similar treatment in terms of gapped quasiparticles already led to an improved agreement between theory and experiments 78,79 .…”
Section: Cuprate Planesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We think, however, that a triplon picture which includes the interactions on the quantitative level can give a good description of the Raman response. A similar treatment in terms of gapped quasiparticles already led to an improved agreement between theory and experiments 78,79 .…”
Section: Cuprate Planesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This magnetic ordering produces a gap for the spinons. Such a mean field description of the antiferromagnetic state was first proposed by Hsu 32 . Similar ideas have subsequently been explored in a number of publications -see Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dispersion, which also has been confirmed using Monte Carlo simulations [2], shows a broad shallow minimum around (0, π). This feature which is not captured within linear spin wave theory (LSW) is reminiscent of a prediction made by Hsu [3]. Treating the Heisenberg model in an approximation involving massive fermions, he found a rather deep minimum in the dispersion at (0, π).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The projection of this state gives long range Neel order with a sublattice magnetization which is in excellent ageement with exact computations. [3] Thus we are led to consider an effective Hamiltonian whose mean field solution gives the π-flux state with the spin density wave. This is accomplished by introducing a weak on-site repulsion V. The value of V is to be determined variationally to produce the proper magnetization and should not be confused with the original strong Hubbard U.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%