1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)85138-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin trapping and some reactions of ruthenium-centred radicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the previous reports [34,52,69], in recent studies no photochemical dissociation of the terminal CO ligand was identified. Instead the cleavage of Ru-CO bridged and Ru-Ru bonds was recognized to follow the excitations at 265 and 330 nm of II-b and II-nb, respectively (paths a and b in Scheme 1) [3,68,69].…”
contrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrary to the previous reports [34,52,69], in recent studies no photochemical dissociation of the terminal CO ligand was identified. Instead the cleavage of Ru-CO bridged and Ru-Ru bonds was recognized to follow the excitations at 265 and 330 nm of II-b and II-nb, respectively (paths a and b in Scheme 1) [3,68,69].…”
contrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Instead the cleavage of Ru-CO bridged and Ru-Ru bonds was recognized to follow the excitations at 265 and 330 nm of II-b and II-nb, respectively (paths a and b in Scheme 1) [3,68,69]. In the former case, the monobridged dimeric radical species is formed, whereas in the latter the monomeric [CpRu(CO) 2 ] · radicals are generated photochemically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The natural isotopes 99Ru and l°tRu (both I= 5/2) can give rise to different hyperfine coupling constants provided that the difference in aRu between these two isotopes is larger than the line width. This was the case for the radicals [RuCp(CO)2] ÷" [36] and [Ru(LXPPh3)(CO)2(o-O2C6C14)] n+ [35] but not for the radicals under study.…”
Section: Esr Spectramentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus, the semiquinone radicals [Ru(L)(PPh3)(CO)2(o-O2C6C14)] n+ [L=PPh 3 (n = 1), halide (n =0)] [35] could be observed as persistent radicals, whereas the metal-centred radicals [RuCp(CO)2] +" [36] and [Ru(SiMe3)(CO)4] +" [37] could only be detected by using a spin trap. The natural isotopes 99Ru and l°tRu (both I= 5/2) can give rise to different hyperfine coupling constants provided that the difference in aRu between these two isotopes is larger than the line width.…”
Section: Esr Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%