2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0046596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-torque switching mechanisms of perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction nanopillars

Abstract: Understanding the magnetization dynamics induced by spin-transfer torques in perpendicularly magnetized magnetic tunnel junction nanopillars and its dependence on material parameters is critical to optimizing device performance. Here we present a micromagnetic study of spin-torque switching in a diskshaped element as a function of the free layer's exchange constant and disk diameter. The switching is shown to generally occur by: 1) growth of the magnetization precession amplitude in the element center; 2) an i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of terms of different symmetry and implicit dependence on the Gilbert damping is a non-obvious consequence of moving from the implicit LLGS equation to explicit form and often not discussed when performing numerical simulations [19][20][21][22], despite numerical packages solving the explicit form [7,8]. This complexity contributes to the confusion in the literature and also difficulty when interpreting experimental measurements between materials with different Gilbert damping constants.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of terms of different symmetry and implicit dependence on the Gilbert damping is a non-obvious consequence of moving from the implicit LLGS equation to explicit form and often not discussed when performing numerical simulations [19][20][21][22], despite numerical packages solving the explicit form [7,8]. This complexity contributes to the confusion in the literature and also difficulty when interpreting experimental measurements between materials with different Gilbert damping constants.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the threshold voltage and current increase relative to the case of perpendicularly magnetized layers, the impact on the overall switching-current requirement for a given write speed and write-error-rate, however, could be less significant. This is because to obtain very low switching errors, a fast write requires a spin current that is much larger than the instability threshold, and the switching dynamics can exhibit non-macrospin behavior [35][36][37][38][39] (e.g. non-uniform magnetization reversal and micromagnetic instabilities) that can modify the difference an increase in instability threshold makes to the overall memory cell optimization.…”
Section: B Switching Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the switching can be described theoretically by macrospin models [9 and 10], the magnetization reversal caused by STT and SOT is in general a complex and non-uniform process that involves the nucleation and expansion of magnetic domains [11 and 12]. This mechanism prevails over the pure macrospin dynamics even in devices as small as few tens of nm because it is more energetically favorable than the coherent rotation of all the magnetic moments [13][14][15][16]. Time-resolved measurements in magnetic tunnel junctions [16][17][18][19][20] and Hall crosses [21] have revealed that the non-uniform switching comprises two phases at the ns and sub-ns timescale: an initial waiting time t 0 during which the magnetization is at rest and the actual transition of duration ∆t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%