2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-torque oscillation in large size nano-magnet with perpendicular magnetic fields

Abstract: DC current induced magnetization reversal and magnetization oscillation was observed in 500 nm large size Co 90 Fe 10 /Cu/Ni 80 Fe 20 pillars. A perpendicular external field enhanced the coercive field separation between the reference layer (Co 90 Fe 10 ) and free layer (Ni 80 Fe 20 ) in the pseudo spin valve, allowing a large window of external magnetic field for exploring the free-layer reversal. The magnetization precession was manifested in terms of the multiple peaks on the differential resistance curves… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the results at room temperature (see Figure S3, Supporting Information), the MEA directions of the Co and Ni films at P i state stay in the [100] direction at 80 K, and the coercive fields of Co and Ni films are about ±250 and ±510 Oe, respectively. It is noted that the resistance of our spin valve is higher than that of the previous reported all-metal spin valves (10 –8 to >10 Ω), which may be owing to the polycrystalline nature of our sample, the contribution from current-in-plane resistance, and/or the possible weak oxidization of the 3d metals in the spin valve.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Consistent with the results at room temperature (see Figure S3, Supporting Information), the MEA directions of the Co and Ni films at P i state stay in the [100] direction at 80 K, and the coercive fields of Co and Ni films are about ±250 and ±510 Oe, respectively. It is noted that the resistance of our spin valve is higher than that of the previous reported all-metal spin valves (10 –8 to >10 Ω), which may be owing to the polycrystalline nature of our sample, the contribution from current-in-plane resistance, and/or the possible weak oxidization of the 3d metals in the spin valve.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…1, (i) only VDD,STT is applied, (ii) only VDD,SOT is applied, and (iii) both VDD,STT and VDD,SOT are applied, in which we have observed qualitatively different frequency trend and oscillation patterns. Therefore, the oscillation in the VICSO is unlikely originated from the synchronization [61,62] between the STT-and SOTinduced oscillations.…”
Section: Corresponding Authors A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ξ which represents the strength of the perpendicular spin torque is set to 0.1. u indicates the spin polarized electron velocity, denoted as u = [(γℏP) /2µ 0 eM s ] J, where ℏ is the Planck constant, P is the spin polarization with fixed as 0.4 [50], µ 0 is the permeability, M S is the saturation magnetization. J and e are the current density and the electron charge, respectively [51][52][53][54]. The magnetic material of the free layer is Co [54] and the parameters are set as: saturation magnetization M S = 5.8 × 10 5 A m −1 , perpendicular magnetic anisotropy constant…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%