1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(97)00133-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-reorientation transitions in magnetic multilayers with cubic anisotropy and biquadratic exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several experiments have been performed motivated by this suggestion [222,375,[513][514][515], but the results seem inconclusive due to the difficulty in distinguishing domain formation from the absence of ferromagnetic order. An identical anomaly is found when an applied magnetic field is made to counterbalance exactly the anisotropy field; in such a case, we are confronted with a first order phase transition [247,[516][517][518][519], and it is likely that the character of the above mentioned reorientation phase transitions is identical. It is not clear, however, whether these magnetic instabilities do correspond to a XY magnetic system (which is expected not to be magnetically ordered at finite temperatures) and some studies do suggest that the system simply breaks into very fine magnetic domains [220,[520][521][522][523][524][525].…”
Section: The Two-dimensional Magnetic Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Several experiments have been performed motivated by this suggestion [222,375,[513][514][515], but the results seem inconclusive due to the difficulty in distinguishing domain formation from the absence of ferromagnetic order. An identical anomaly is found when an applied magnetic field is made to counterbalance exactly the anisotropy field; in such a case, we are confronted with a first order phase transition [247,[516][517][518][519], and it is likely that the character of the above mentioned reorientation phase transitions is identical. It is not clear, however, whether these magnetic instabilities do correspond to a XY magnetic system (which is expected not to be magnetically ordered at finite temperatures) and some studies do suggest that the system simply breaks into very fine magnetic domains [220,[520][521][522][523][524][525].…”
Section: The Two-dimensional Magnetic Phase Transitionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The analysis of the experimental results was performed in the framework of a theoretical model [9,10] taking into account the bilinear and biquadratic exchange interactions between two magnetic layers of iron separated by a nonmagnetic spacer and the cubic and uniaxial anisotropy in the iron layers. The magnetic moments within the magnetic layers are ordered ferromagnetically and the magnetization of each Fe layer makes angles of θ 1 and θ 2 with the direction [100].…”
Section: Calculation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure presents the change of the normalized projection of the magnetization (M R /M S ) and the normalized angle of rotation of the polarization plane ( R / S ), both measured in magnetic field H = 0 (M R and R are remanent magnetization and remanent rotation, respectively). There are also the dependences of M R /M S on the angle α at 300 K (•) and at 10 K (•) and the dependence of R / S ( ) on the angle α at 300 K. According to a theoretical model [9,10], which is successfully applied to the description of the layered magnetic structure [5,6], we consider that the magnetic moments inside the iron layers are ordered ferromagnetically, as in the common case of bulk iron. In this situation the magnetic state of this layered system is characterized by the directions of the magnetization in two Fe layers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%