2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.92.214509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin reorientation driven by the interplay between spin-orbit coupling and Hund's rule coupling in iron pnictides

Abstract: In most magnetically-ordered iron pnictides, the magnetic moments lie in the FeAs planes, parallel to the modulation direction of the spin stripes. However, recent experiments in hole-doped iron pnictides have observed a reorientation of the magnetic moments from in-plane to out-of-plane. Interestingly, this reorientation is accompanied by a change in the magnetic ground state from a stripe antiferromagnet to a tetragonal non-uniform magnetic configuration. Motivated by these recent observations, here we inves… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
93
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it has become the focus of many recent first principle reports to reveal what parameters are causing the sudden reordering of the single-Q C 2 structure into this novel double-Q structure and how this new phase hosts superconductivity. 12,[15][16][17][18][19] Currently, several different proposed models predict the observed C 4 but they do so through different mechanisms which range from expanded itinerant mean field models to impurity scattering stabilization to spin-orbit coupling driven spin anisotropies. 15,17,18 The different models invoke varying assumptions about the underlying physics in these materials and necessarily predict different, sometimes subtlety so, manifestations of the C 4 phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it has become the focus of many recent first principle reports to reveal what parameters are causing the sudden reordering of the single-Q C 2 structure into this novel double-Q structure and how this new phase hosts superconductivity. 12,[15][16][17][18][19] Currently, several different proposed models predict the observed C 4 but they do so through different mechanisms which range from expanded itinerant mean field models to impurity scattering stabilization to spin-orbit coupling driven spin anisotropies. 15,17,18 The different models invoke varying assumptions about the underlying physics in these materials and necessarily predict different, sometimes subtlety so, manifestations of the C 4 phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most of the iron-based superconductors exhibit an antiferromagnetic stripe order 2 , bulk FeSe appears to be paramagnetic 10 . This has led others to investigate various magnetic configurations to compete with the C 2 stripe order (alternatively, collinear or single-q), particularly C 4 (alternatively, tetragonal or double-q) orders, which have been given various labels; orthomagnetic (OM) and spin charge order (SCO) [11][12][13][14] , C 4 spin density wave (SDW) 15 , spin vortex crystal (SVC) and charge-spin density wave (CSDW) [16][17][18] . The orthomagnetic order is equivalent to the spin vortex crystal, while the spin charge order is equivalent to the charge-spin density wave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several microscopic mechanisms have been proposed to explain their origin [4,5,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. However, they generally suffer from two drawbacks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is in contradiction with the sizable spin-orbit coupling (SOC) observed in these systems [36], whose 100 K energy scale is comparable to the typical magnetic transition temperature. As a result, the spin anisotropies induced by SOC [29], which are experimentally observed by neutron scattering and NMR [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], cannot be neglected near the magnetic transition. More broadly, it is difficult to attribute the observed near degeneracy between the C 2 and C 4 phases only to material-specific properties, since this behavior is often seen close to the putative quantum critical point [see schematic Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%