1978
DOI: 10.1002/qua.560140104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin‐projected EHF method. IV. Comparison of potential curves given by different one‐electron methods

Abstract: AbstractsSome aspects of the computer realization of the spin-projected extended Hartree-Fock (EHF) method at the ab initio level are briefly discussed for the algorithm of solution developed in the previous papers of this series. Calculations have been performed for the BH molecule by using a small basis of contracted Gaussian lobes with the purpose of comparing the potential curves given by the different one-electron methods RHF, UHF, UHF with subsequent spin projection, and EHF. It is concluded that the UHF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[If all A' s except one are 1.0, then expression (15) reduces to zero.] The charge density matrix [13,24,22] [defined as the coefficient matrix of the one-electron integrals in (5)] is…”
Section: (B) Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[If all A' s except one are 1.0, then expression (15) reduces to zero.] The charge density matrix [13,24,22] [defined as the coefficient matrix of the one-electron integrals in (5)] is…”
Section: (B) Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Single point energies were calculated for all cation-radical structures, as mentioned above. The UMP2 energies were corrected for contamination by higher spin states using the standard spin annihilation procedure [18,19]. The spinprojected single-point MP2 energies (PMP2) were combined with B3LYP energies (B3-PMP2) to improve accuracy through cancellation of small errors inherent to both methods Scheme 1.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single point energies were calculated with B3LYP/6-311++G(2 d,p) and MP2/6-311++G(2 d,p) [34], and averaged to cancel out known errors in each method [35]. Calculations of open-shell systems were performed with the spin-unrestricted formalism (UB3LYP and UMP2), and higher spin states in UMP2 calculations were annihilated by standard projection procedures [36,37].…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%