2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.054410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin precession and inverted Hanle effect in a semiconductor near a finite-roughness ferromagnetic interface

Abstract: Although the creation of spin polarization in various nonmagnetic media via electrical spin injection from a ferromagnetic tunnel contact has been demonstrated, much of the basic behavior is heavily debated. It is reported here that, for semiconductor/Al 2 O 3 /ferromagnet tunnel structures based on Si or GaAs, local magnetostatic fields arising from interface roughness dramatically alter and even dominate the accumulation and dynamics of spins in the semiconductor. Spin precession in inhomogeneous magnetic fi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

23
229
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
23
229
5
Order By: Relevance
“…3 This explains the large amount of work on spintronics with hybrid metal/semiconductor heterostructures for the past ten years, once it was proposed to solve the problem of impedance mismatch 4 by the use of an interface resistance, typically a tunneling barrier. [5][6][7] Various experiments have been performed to detect by electrical (e.g., the electrical Hanle effect) or by optical means a spin-polarized current injected from a ferromagnetic reservoir into a III-V semiconductor through an Al 2 O 3 barrier, [8][9][10][11][12] through MgO, [12][13][14][15][16] and through GaO, 17 or into Si through Al 2 O 3 (Refs. [18][19][20][21][22] and SiO 2 (Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This explains the large amount of work on spintronics with hybrid metal/semiconductor heterostructures for the past ten years, once it was proposed to solve the problem of impedance mismatch 4 by the use of an interface resistance, typically a tunneling barrier. [5][6][7] Various experiments have been performed to detect by electrical (e.g., the electrical Hanle effect) or by optical means a spin-polarized current injected from a ferromagnetic reservoir into a III-V semiconductor through an Al 2 O 3 barrier, [8][9][10][11][12] through MgO, [12][13][14][15][16] and through GaO, 17 or into Si through Al 2 O 3 (Refs. [18][19][20][21][22] and SiO 2 (Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Another possibility is that the spin lifetime is limited by contact effects such as inhomogeneous stray fields. 34 Due to its atomically thin nature, this could have a larger effect for graphene compared to semiconductor or metallic spin transport systems that are typically much thicker.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a and 3b, significant normal Hanle signals (DV TH, normal ) with the Lorentzian line shape similar to that of DV EH (see Fig. 2a) were observed at 300 K. The inverted Hanle signals (DV TH, inverted ) 27,28 in B x (Figs. 3c and 3d), roughly half the magnitude of the DV TH, normal , were also clearly measured.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Clear electrical Hanle signals (DV EH ) with a Lorentzian line shape are detected at RT. It should be noted that the full spin accumulation (Dm) consists of the inverted Hanle signal (DV EH, inverted ) in B x and the normal Hanle signal (DV EH, normal ) in B z 27,28 . As shown in Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%