2018
DOI: 10.1134/s1995080218010109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin Polarization-Scaling Quantum Maps and Channels

Abstract: We introduce a spin polarization-scaling map for spin-j particles, whose physical meaning is the decrease of spin polarization along three mutually orthogonal axes. We find conditions on three scaling parameters under which the map is positive, completely positive, entanglement breaking, 2-tensor-stable positive, and 2-locally entanglement annihilating. The results are specified for maps on spin-1 particles. The difference from the case of spin-1 2 particles is emphasized.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the multiple photon addition and subtraction operations can be treated in the same way because Interestingly, in contrast to the quantum channels [32][33][34][35], the quantum informational properties of quantum operations such as capacities and entanglement degradation remain essentially unstudied. From this viewpoint, the fair quantum operations (4) and (5) can be analyzed as paradigmatic examples of operations on continuousvariable quantum states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the multiple photon addition and subtraction operations can be treated in the same way because Interestingly, in contrast to the quantum channels [32][33][34][35], the quantum informational properties of quantum operations such as capacities and entanglement degradation remain essentially unstudied. From this viewpoint, the fair quantum operations (4) and (5) can be analyzed as paradigmatic examples of operations on continuousvariable quantum states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the interface repulsion interactions of metal-Mg or metal-O were more vigorous than those of Al-Mg or Al-O. In the TiCo-Mg and TiCo-O terminations, the bond lengths of Co-Mg and Co-O were longer than those of Ti-Mg and Ti-O, thereby creating an uneven interface atomic layer that led to further spin electronic scattering from the mechanical mismatch interface layers to weaken the spin polarization [37]. Table 2 summarizes the atom-resolved magnetic moments (AMMs) at the interface and subinterface layers in Ti 2 CoAl and at the interface layer in MgO for various terminations of the Ti 2 CoAl/MgO(100) interface.…”
Section: Interface Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , Corollary 6.13), and is trace preserving as 3 k=1 J 2 k = j(j + 1)I (Ref. 3 , section 6.1.2, formula (5)). The latter formula is also responsible for unitality of the map (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%