2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.66.036703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin polarization of the low-density three-dimensional electron gas

Abstract: To determine the state of spin polarization of the 3D electron gas at very low densities and zero temperature, we calculate the energy versus spin polarization using Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo methods with backflow wavefunctions and twist averaged boundary conditions. We find a second order phase transition to a partially polarized phase at rs ∼ 50 ± 2. The magnetic transition temperature is estimated using an effective mean field method, the Stoner model.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
155
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
155
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical error bars on their data are much larger than on the fluid data of Zong et al 6 or on our Wigner crystal data, which hampers detailed comparisons. However, it appears that the main reason for the discrepancy is that Ortiz to highlight the differences between phases.…”
Section: Locating the Fluid-to-crystal Transition Densitymentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The statistical error bars on their data are much larger than on the fluid data of Zong et al 6 or on our Wigner crystal data, which hampers detailed comparisons. However, it appears that the main reason for the discrepancy is that Ortiz to highlight the differences between phases.…”
Section: Locating the Fluid-to-crystal Transition Densitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We found the transition from the fluid to crystalline phases to occur at r s = 106 ± 1, in agreement with the original result of Ceperley and Alder. 3 Note, however, that the transition density predicted using the fluid data of Zong et al 6 in conjunction with the crystal data of Ceperley and Alder would be somewhat lower, at about r s = 127. Our Wigner crystal energies are slightly lower than those of Ceperley and Alder, even though they studied a Bose crystal, which must have a lower energy than the corresponding fermion one.…”
Section: Locating the Fluid-to-crystal Transition Densitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23,24 The resulting bias is negative, and is generally believed to fall off as 1/N , where N is the number of atoms in the simulation cell. 11,25,26,27 In order to eliminate the finite-size bias, simulations were carried out in supercells consisting of 3×3×3 and 4×4×4 primitive unit cells. The error in the DFT results arising from the use of a 3 × 3 × 3 k-point mesh is small (about 0.0001 a.u.…”
Section: Finite-size Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%