1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01426080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin polarization of Auger- and of photoelectrons from barium atoms exposed to circularly polarized radiation and their cross comparison

Abstract: Abstract.New results of spin polarization of both photoelectrons and Auger electrons are reported after 5p photoionization of free Ba atoms with circularly polarized light. A substantial polarization transfer from the spin polarized photons to the spin polarized photoelectrons and via the hole state orientation to the spin polarized Auger-electrons is observed. The cross comparison of the results for photoelectrons and Auger-electrons allows a quantitative test of the assumed two step model where both electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the corresponding photoionization and Auger process of free Ba atoms [14] (also with two outermost s electrons in singlet state configuration) the Auger emission from the Rb adlayer atoms can be quantitatively described within the non-relativistic LS approximation while the photoemission deviates from this model due to non vanishing differences in the dipole matrix elements cd . It is worth noting that the relationships of the non-relativistic approximation [11] A3=2 -½A½ and a~ = -½~± are not fulfilled.…”
Section: 19supporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with the corresponding photoionization and Auger process of free Ba atoms [14] (also with two outermost s electrons in singlet state configuration) the Auger emission from the Rb adlayer atoms can be quantitatively described within the non-relativistic LS approximation while the photoemission deviates from this model due to non vanishing differences in the dipole matrix elements cd . It is worth noting that the relationships of the non-relativistic approximation [11] A3=2 -½A½ and a~ = -½~± are not fulfilled.…”
Section: 19supporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is worth noting that the relationships of the non-relativistic approximation [11] A3=2 -½A½ and a~ = -½~± are not fulfilled. 7 From t~he dynamical parameters for photoemission given above, the Auger electron spin polarization can be calculated within an atomic model using the non-relativistic LS-approximation (neglecting any influence of the spin-orbit interaction in the continuum states) [14]. Thereby the two step model [15] is applied, treating the emission processes of photoelectrons and Auger electrons as independent and subsequent processes.…”
Section: 19mentioning
confidence: 99%