2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin parity of spiral galaxies II: a catalogue of 80 k spiral galaxies using big data from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey and deep learning

Abstract: Abstract We report an automated morphological classification of galaxies into S-wise spirals, Z-wise spirals, and non-spirals using big image data taken from Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Survey and a convolutional neural network(CNN)-based deep learning technique. The HSC i-band images are about 25 times deeper than those from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and have a two times higher spatial resolution, allowing us to identify substructures such as spiral… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, we apply the well-tuned deep learning model to the main targets, the 54871 bright galaxies at z = 0.01-0.3, to choose spiral galaxies among them. Because our final sample consists of sufficiently bright (rpetro < 18) and massive (M > 10 10 M ) galaxies at z < 0.3, we assume that the redshift bias of the spiral classification is negligible (see also Tadaki et al 2020). Automatic and efficient deep learning classification enabled us to categorize such a large amount of dataset in only 330 sec on the GPU environment.…”
Section: Selection Of Passive Spiral Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First of all, we apply the well-tuned deep learning model to the main targets, the 54871 bright galaxies at z = 0.01-0.3, to choose spiral galaxies among them. Because our final sample consists of sufficiently bright (rpetro < 18) and massive (M > 10 10 M ) galaxies at z < 0.3, we assume that the redshift bias of the spiral classification is negligible (see also Tadaki et al 2020). Automatic and efficient deep learning classification enabled us to categorize such a large amount of dataset in only 330 sec on the GPU environment.…”
Section: Selection Of Passive Spiral Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such high-quality data, we can expect to capture fainter spiral arms not detected in previous surveys and those with smaller pitch angles mistaken for ringed galaxies. Many studies have demonstrated the utility of the HSC-SSP data, such as galaxy morphological classifications (Tadaki et al 2020;Martin et al 2020;Shimakawa et al 2021), weak lensing measurements (Oguri et al 2018;Oguri et al 2021), and anomaly detection (Storey-Fisher et al 2021;Tanaka et al 2021). Therefore, the HSC-SSP data will enable us to significantly expand upon existing passive spiral samples, offering a unique opportunity to understand the transition phase from spiral galaxies to early-type galaxies statistically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such applications, the CNN is trained on labelled observations and then applied to mock images. In addition to global morphology, Tadaki et al (2020) used also a similar supervised CNN setting to classify spiral galaxies based on their resolved properties (i.e. type of spiral arms).…”
Section: Cnns As State-of-the-art Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this techniques has not achieved a high accuracy (e.g., Huertas-Company et al 2014;Mager et al 2017). More recently, in efforts to find an automatic approach scalable to large numbers of objects (> 10 4 ) and applicable to future surveys such as the Large Survey of Space and Time (LSST) some works have used machine learning and convolutional neural networks to provide automated classification (e.g., Dieleman et al 2015;Aniyan & Thorat 2017;Ghosh 2019;Tadaki et al 2020;Cheng et al;Walmsley et al 2020). However, these networks are not applicable to all data sets as they are each trained on different data sets with different qualities with varying degrees of success.…”
Section: Morphological Classification Of Large Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%