2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.2.041013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-Orbital Quantum Liquid on the Honeycomb Lattice

Abstract: The main characteristic of Mott insulators, as compared to band insulators, is to host low-energy spin fluctuations. In addition, Mott insulators often possess orbital degrees of freedom when crystal-field levels are partially filled. While in the majority of Mott insulators, spins and orbitals develop long-range order, the possibility for the ground state to be a quantum liquid opens new perspectives. In this paper, we provide clear evidence that the spin-orbital SUð4Þ symmetric Kugel-Khomskii model of Mott i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
243
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
243
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we formulate the iPEPS ansatz on the honeycomb lattice by mapping it onto a brick-wall lattice in which the connectivity of the honeycomb lattice is reproduced exactly by introducing a trivial index on each tensor [26]. We have studied wave functions made of up to 2 × 2 unit cells with all four (rank-5) tensors being independent (see Fig.…”
Section: A Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we formulate the iPEPS ansatz on the honeycomb lattice by mapping it onto a brick-wall lattice in which the connectivity of the honeycomb lattice is reproduced exactly by introducing a trivial index on each tensor [26]. We have studied wave functions made of up to 2 × 2 unit cells with all four (rank-5) tensors being independent (see Fig.…”
Section: A Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now, two decades after its development, MPS (or the DMRG) have become the golden standard for the simulation of 1D lattice models. Furthermore, their two-dimensional (2D) generalizations known as projected entangled-pair states (PEPS) [20,21] (and their thermodynamic limit version infinite PEPS or iPEPS) [22,23] have been successfully used to study both fermionic systems as well as frustrated magnets [24][25][26][27][28], with a notable example being the lowest variational energies for the t-J model available to date for large systems [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example numerical investigations of the SU(3)-Heisenberg model in a triangular lattice predict a perfectly ordered three-sublattice state [131]. On a honeycomb lattice, the SU (3) case has been shown to have a dimerized,magnetically ordered state [132][133][134], and it has been also predicted that the SU(6) case becomes a ACSL using a large 1/N expansion [135,136]. Whether or not the ACSL remains the ground state in the experimentally relevant part of the phase diagram, k = N and n = 1 is not unknown and needs to be validated by experiments.…”
Section: Strong Coupling Limit: the Su(n ) Heisenberg Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A D = 1 iPEPS simply corresponds to a sitefactorized wave function (a product state), and by increasing D quantum fluctuations can be systematically added to the state. A D = 2 iPEPS includes short-range quantum fluctuations and often qualitatively reproduces the results from linear spin-wave (or flavor-wave) theory [34][35][36]. Here we consider iPEPS with D up to 12, which enables us to represent highlyentangled states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%