1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80524-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin-lock imaging in contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of human gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complication of reducing TR is the reduced recovery of the longitudinal magnetization. At steady state, this introduces T 1 contamination, as described by Aronen et al The ability to accurately report and compare T 1ρ values across different pulse sequences and field strengths is important. To accurately account for T 1 contamination, T 2 * and T 1 values of the tissue are required, resulting in increased scan time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The complication of reducing TR is the reduced recovery of the longitudinal magnetization. At steady state, this introduces T 1 contamination, as described by Aronen et al The ability to accurately report and compare T 1ρ values across different pulse sequences and field strengths is important. To accurately account for T 1 contamination, T 2 * and T 1 values of the tissue are required, resulting in increased scan time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach may result in significant T 1 contamination because of incomplete recovery of the longitudinal magnetization. 21 T 1 compensation is necessary for accurate measurement of T 1ρ based on the following equation: S(),TSLeitalicTSLtrue/T1normalρ×(1e(),italicTRitalicTSLtrue/T11eitalicTSLtrue/T1normalρ×e(),italicTRitalicTSLtrue/T1×italiccosα×italicsinα+C where TR is the time between RF excitation pulses with a flip angle α , T 1ρ is the spin–lattice relaxation time of the tissue of interest and T 1 is the longitudinal relaxation time of the tissue of interest. A constant term C is introduced to account for background noise and artifacts associated with 3D UTE‐Cones‐ T 1ρ data acquisition and image reconstruction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…81 At the time of writing very few reports pertaining to this hypothesis exist. [82][83][84][85] With the exception of one publication investigating spin locking with Ablavar, 82 the focus has solely been on Magnevist and the study of imaging metrics such as contrast and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) [83][84][85] rather than the specific effect on relaxivity, a key indicator of CA effectiveness and determinant of agent detectability.…”
Section: Establishing the Potential Benefits Of Spin Locking On Relaxmentioning
confidence: 99%