2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin–isospin selectivity in three-nucleon forces

Abstract: Precision data are presented for the break-up reaction, 2 H( p, pp)n, within the framework of nuclear-force studies. The experiment was carried out at KVI using a polarized-proton beam of 190 MeV impinging on a liquid-deuterium target and by exploiting the detector, BINA. Some of the vector-analyzing powers are presented and compared with state-of-the-art Faddeev calculations including three-nucleon forces effect. Significant discrepancies between the data and theoretical predictions were observed for kinemati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the data presented here, the measurements of the breakup reaction at higher energies also hint at problems with a proper description of the vector analyzing powers [28][29][30][31]. The observed discrepancies seem to be stronger in proton analyzing powers than in the deuteron ones.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the data presented here, the measurements of the breakup reaction at higher energies also hint at problems with a proper description of the vector analyzing powers [28][29][30][31]. The observed discrepancies seem to be stronger in proton analyzing powers than in the deuteron ones.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…This study shows a good description of the data by the NN interaction alone but reveals also certain regions where discrepancies cannot be cured by the inclusion of any of the existing 3NF models. It is important to mention here that very recently the problems with describing polarization observables was also demonstrated in the data measured for the p-d breakup at 135 MeV [28] and 190 MeV [29], as well as in the case of the d-p breakup data: at 270 MeV [30] and in several configurations at 135 MeV/A [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain problems with describing (proton) vector analyzing powers were demonstrated by the data measured for the p-d breakup at 135 MeV [45] and 190 MeV [46]. Vector (deuteron) analyzing power and spin correlation coefficients for the d-p breakup at 270 MeV (135 MeV/nucleon) are relatively well described by pure NN interactions, while the remaining discrepancies are not removed by adding 3NF [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, certain discrepancies are observed for the tensor analyzing powers of the breakup reaction at the same beam energies, even if (or when) the 3NF is included in the calculations [16]. The experimental studies of the 2 H(p,pp)n reaction at 135 and 190 MeV [17,18] show a large (and growing with beam energy) discrepancy between the measured data and the theoretical predictions for the vector analyzing power A p y . It is located at small relative azimuthal angles of the two breakup protons, and even increases with the three-nucleon force included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%