1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.15178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin fluctuations in itinerant electron antiferromagnetism and anomalous properties of Y(Sc)Mn2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 and its inset show the 1/T 1 T versus T plots in CeIrIn 5 at P = 0, 1.0, 1.58 and 2.1 GPa and LaIrIn 5 at P = 0 GPa in linear and logarithmic scales, respectively. At P = 0 GPa, the T dependence of 1/T 1 T above T c is well explained by the anisotropic antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations model [4,12]. As seen in Fig.3, the application of pressure markedly suppresses the antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations, bringing the system away from the antiferromagnetic QCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 and its inset show the 1/T 1 T versus T plots in CeIrIn 5 at P = 0, 1.0, 1.58 and 2.1 GPa and LaIrIn 5 at P = 0 GPa in linear and logarithmic scales, respectively. At P = 0 GPa, the T dependence of 1/T 1 T above T c is well explained by the anisotropic antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations model [4,12]. As seen in Fig.3, the application of pressure markedly suppresses the antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations, bringing the system away from the antiferromagnetic QCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The same analysis was applied to CeCoIn 5 with resulting θ = 0.6 K [9,11]. Note that θ is a measure to what extent the system is close to an antiferromagnetic quantum critical point (QCP) [12]. It was suggested that the difference in the value of θ between CeIrIn 5 and CeCoIn 5 may lead to the large difference in the value of T c .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us now consider a situation where the dispersion of the SFs is in-between 2D and 3D ones. If the SF dispersion in one direction is flat, namely, the magnetic correlation length (ξ) is much shorter in one direction than in others, then by assuming χ(Q+q) −1 = χ −1 Q +a 1 (q 2 x +q 2 y )+a 2 q 4 z instead of isotropic quadratic dispersion [19], it is shown that 1/T 1 T ∝ χ 3/4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mn spin correlation length is 2.86 Å, which is about the distance between the nearest Mn atoms along ͓110͔ direction, while is only 1.72 Å along the ͓001͔ direction. Lacroix et al 23 have developed an extended SCR theory to explain the low-T SF character found by the neutron experiment and predicted that 1/T 1 T should vary as Q 3/4 where Q is the staggered susceptibility at AF wave vector Q. One may think this prediction as a consequence of the decrease in the dimensionality, since in threedimensional ͑3D͒ systems 1/T 1 Tϰ Q 1/2 and in 2D systems 1/T 1 Tϰ Q , 3 In the case of strong AF spin fluctuation, 1/T 1 is dominated by Q , which follows the Curie-Weiss type T dependence, 3 therefore 1/T 1 Tϰ Q 3/4 ϰ1/(Tϩ) 3/4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%